Table 2.
rTAR | oTAR | P * | |
---|---|---|---|
n = 90 | n = 79 | ||
Skin-to-skin operative time (min), mean(s.d.) | 242 (82) | 188 (90) | <0.001 |
Wound contamination class† | 0.465 | ||
Clean | 87 (96.7) | 73 (92.4) | |
Clean contaminated | 2 (2.2) | 4 (5.1) | |
Contaminated | 1 (1.1) | 2 (2.5) | |
Dirty | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | |
Antibiotic prophylaxis | 64 (71.1) | 79 (100) | <0.001 |
Mesh type used | 0.526 | ||
Polyester | 68 (75.6) | 61 (77.2) | |
Polyvinylidene | 17 (18.9) | 17 (21.5) | |
Polypropylene | 2 (2.2) | 1 (1.3) | |
Unknown | 3 (3.3) | 0 (0) | |
Mesh size (cm2), mean(s.d.) | 980 (354) | 1344 (460) | <0.001 |
Hernia defect closure | 89 (98.9) | 74 (93.7) | 0.119 |
Combined surgical procedure | 1 (1.1) | 15 (19.0) | <0.001 |
Intraoperative complications | 8 (8.9) | 13 (16.5) | 0.137 |
rTAR, robotic-assisted transversus abdominis release; oTAR, open transversus abdominis release. Values are n (%) unless otherwise indicated.
For normally distributed continuous variables, an independent samples t test was used. When a normal distribution could not be assumed, a Mann–Whitney U test was used. The chi-squared and Fisher’s test were used to compare categorical data. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification15.