Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 24.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2020 Oct 24;307:111216. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2020.111216

Table 3.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of both study samples analyzed in Study 3.

Combined EMBARC and Little Rock study samples N = 223 Recent-SA (n = 11) Mean ± SD Remote-SA (n = 32) Mean ± SD Lifetime-SI (n = 84) Mean ± SD Depressed (n = 96) Mean ± SD p-value
Age 34.09 ± 10.39 38.09 ± 12.06 34.30 ± 12.35 38.61 ± 13.62 p=.118
Gender (female %) 9 (81.8%) 21 (65.6%) 58 (69.0%) 55 (57.3%) p=.225
Education (years) 12.82 ± 1.25 14.53 ± 2.59 14.89 ± 2.28 14.96 ± 2.94 p=.070
Number of suicide attempts 2.73 ± 2.15 1.52 ± 0.87 N/A N/A p=.097
Ethnicity (Caucasian%) 9 (81.8%) 24 (77.4%) 60 (71.4%) 60 (64.2%) p=.899
Antidepressant-only Little Rock sample (yes%) 100% 34.4% 14.3% 2.1% p<.001
Depression severity 123.59 141.33 107.43 104.90 p=.009*

Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for depression severity ranking (BDI-II and HAM-D).