Table 3.
Analyses using self-reported CHU9D and tariffs from an adult population
|
Self-reported CHU9D Tariffs based on preferences of a youth population |
Parent-reported CHU9D Tariffs based on preferences of an adult population |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MMM (n = 197) mean ± se |
MAU (n = 199) mean ± se |
MMM (n = 197) mean ± se |
MAU (n = 199) mean ± se |
|
| Baseline | 0.642 ± 0.016 | 0.631 ± 0.016 | 0.806 ± 0.009 | 0.802 ± 0.008 |
| End-of-treatment (week 18) | 0.728 ± 0.016 | 0.684 ± 0.018 | 0.873 ± 0.008 | 0.844 ± 0.009 |
| Follow-up (week 26) | 0.769 ± 0.015 | 0.708 ± 0.186 | 0.886 ± 0.008 | 0.839 ± 0.009 |
| QALY | 0.352 ± 0.007 | 0.335 ± 0.007 | 0.426 ± 0.003 | 0.414 ± 0.004 |
| Incremental QALYs | ||||
| Unadjusted | 0.017 ± 0.009 | 0.012 ± 0.005 | ||
| Adjusted for baseline | 0.014 (95% CI: 0.002–0.027) | 0.010 (95% CI: 0.004–0.016) | ||
| ICER | €210,757 /QALY gained | €291,916 /QALY gained | ||
Values presented are the mean (standard error (SE)) of the intention-to-treat population from 20 imputed datasets. Adjusted incremental quality adjusted life years (QALY) are adjusted for baseline utility. The confidence intervals (CIs) were derived from 10,000 bootstrap replications from 20 imputed datasets using the standard normal method
CHU9D Child Health Utility 9D, ICER Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio