Table 5.
Typical data comparison table of UWB, RGB cameras and lidar.
| Classification | UWB | RGB Camera | Lidar |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power consumption: | Low | Low | High |
| Perceived distance: | 100 m | - | - |
| Weight: | 12 g | 100 g | 925 g |
| Single price: | Dozens of dollars | A few thousand dollars | Tens of thousands of dollars |
| Positioning mode: | Anchor-Tag or Distributed | Distributed | Distributed |
| Method of cooperation: | Cooperation | Non-cooperative | Non-cooperative |
| Environmental impact: | smaller | Data sets need to be learned | Affected by smog |
| Measurement frequency: | 372 Hz | 90 FPS | 20 Hz |
| Positioning delay: | Lower | Environment complexity correlation | Lower |