Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0270128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270128

Table 4. Comparison of SVM-ESM-1b and PrePS prenylation predictions with empirical observations.

Reporter Prenylation
Ydj1-Cxxx SVMa,b PrePS Freq FPB Observedc
CAAQ + - + - +
CAHQ + - + - +
CASA + - + - +
CKQH + - + - +
CNLI + - + - +
CSFL + - + - +
CVAA + - + - +
CVFM + - + - +
CKQG - + + - +
CKQL - + + - +
CQTS - + - - +
CQSQd + + - - +
number observed/predicted 9/12 4/12 10/12 0/12

aSigns represent predictions of prenylation and cleavage that were reported as positive (+) or negative (-) by the indicated model.

bSVM–SVM-ESM-1b; PrePS–Prenylation Prediction Suite; Freq–in-house, frequency-based; FPB–FlexPepBind.

cObserved by Ydj1p prenylation gel shift–see Fig 3B.

dObservation previously reported [22].