. 2021 Jul 1;36(7):1433–1441. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01552-8

Table 1.

Comparison of classification results for detecting DR and DMO with reported state-of-the-art methods.

Author	Retinopathy	AUC (95% CI)	Sen (95% CI)	Spe (95% CI)
Sahlsten et al. [26]	DR	0.967 (0.955–0.976)	0.859 (0.826–0.888)	0.971 (0.956–0.982)
Sahlsten et al. [26]	DMO	0.946 (0.932–0.958)	0.597 (0.530–0.662)	0.992 (0.984–0.996)
Abbas et al. [27]	DR	0.924	0.922	0.945
Abbas et al. [27]	DMO	N/A	N/A	N/A
Gonza̒lez-Gonzalo et al. [28]	DR	0.975	0.920	0.921
Gonza̒lez-Gonzalo et al. [28]	DMO	0.927	0.858	0.860
Ours	DR	0.977 (0.974–0.981)	0.923 (0.917–0.925)	0.947 (0.937–0.954)
Ours	DMO	0.948 (0.943–0.951)	0.886 (0.881–0.892)	0.908 (0.898–0.912)

DR diabetic retinopathy, DMO diabetic macular oedema, AUC Area Under Curve, CI confidence interval, Sen Sensitivity, Spe Specificity.