Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 24;13:3610. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31029-5

Table 1.

Experimental and calculated collision cross sections (Å2) representing the cylindrical 6-mer nanostructure (6HB) as well as suggested 12HB and 18HB models (Fig. 4).

Calc. CCS (Å2) Calc. CCS (Å2) Calc. CCS (Å2) Calc. CCS (Å2)
Oligomer Exp. CCS (Å2) PA IMPACT PA (Monte Carlo) IMoS TJM IMPACT EHSS IMoS
Hexamer (6-mer)
6HB 4740 ± 40
Expected diameter barrel (6HB) 4816 ± 18 4865 6269 ± 25 6344
Squished barrel (6HB-SQ) 4624 ± 11
Dodecamer (12-mer)
12HB 7545 ± 36
Linear side-by-side (12HB-a) 8174 ± 26 8286 10,932 ± 37 10,694
Stacked end-to-end (12HB-b) 8256 ± 29 8415 11,048 ± 41 10,750
Larger diameter barrel (12HB) 8364 ± 33 8471 11,200 ± 47 10,925
Squished barrel (12HB-SQ) 7374 ± 23
Octadecamer (18-mer)
18HB 9578 ± 41
Triangle side-by-side (18HB-a) 10,647 ± 30 10,801 14,433 ± 43 14,321
Linear side by side (18HB-b) 11,530 ± 40 11,563 15,695 ± 58 14,953
Stacked end-to-end (18HB-c) 11,724 ± 44 11,889 15,972 ± 64 14,983
Larger diameter barrel (18HB) 13,364 ± 50 13,459 18,329 ± 72 17,236
Squished barrel (18HB-SQ) 10,879 ± 32

Values in bold are the experimentally derived collision cross sections (CCS).