Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pharm Sci. 2022 Jan 2;111(7):2121–2133. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2021.12.023

Table 4.

Common failure modes of an SV-AUC run and their root causes.

Error / failure Manifestation Potential root cause



Loading sample on the reference side and vice versa Erroneous absorbance readings, potentially incorrect lamp intensity set Analyst error



Cell leakage during the run Vacuum decrease/jumps, moving meniscus, fitting artifacts, significantly unequal column heights after the run Inappropriate cell sealing



Cell leakage at the start of a run at 60k/50k rpm Moving meniscus, vacuum decrease, lack of expected data type during fitting Inappropriate cell sealing



Contamination from another sample Unexpected species in the c(s) distribution Inappropriate cleaning of cell and centerpiece



Unstable temperature during the run Best-fit meniscus is far off the optically discerned meniscus; poor fits in initial scans Insufficient temperature equilibration time



High solute (reference) absorbance Low signal-to-noise, poor fits with high RMSD Absorbing excipients present