Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2022 Jan 10;23(6):1006–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.12.010

Table 8.

Results of bootstrapped indirect effects tests predicting nociceptive outcomes

Boot 95% CI
Dependent Variable Indirect Effect Boot SE Lower Upper R2
NFR Threshold 0.282 0.259 −0.172 0.869 0.088
3-Stimulation NFR Threshold 0.010 0.172 −0.372 0.341 0.027
CPM-Pain 0.203 0.181 −0.102 0.633 0.097
CPM-NFR 0.033 0.017 0.006 0.073 0.126
TS-Pain 0.548 0.371 −0.014 1.406 0.079
TS-NFR 0.019 0.014 −0.003 0.052 0.152

Note: All models included the following covariates: sex, age, MAP, BMI, general health perception, education, income, and trauma exposure. CPM/TS models controlled for the stimulation intensity of the electric stimulations delivered. CPM=conditioned pain modulation. NFR=nociceptive flexion reflex. TS=temporal summation. R-squared values represent the proportion of variance explained in the nociceptive outcome by the model.