Table 3.
Baseline Comparisons in Episodic Future Thinking
| Study 1 | Study 2 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Control | Past Year SI | Psychiatric Control | Past Year SI | ||||||
| M (SD) | M (SD) | df | d | M (SD) | M (SD) | df | r | ||
| Fluency count | 6.52 (1.91) | 5.98 (1.57) | 23 | −0.32 | 6.61 (1.41) | 5.89 (1.62) | 137 | −.25a | |
| Self-report ratings | |||||||||
| Vivid | 3.31 (0.71) | 3.44 (0.46) | 23 | 0.24 | 3.60 (0.31) | 3.61 (0.37) | 136 | .05 | |
| Duration | 3.07 (0.74) | 3.41 (0.82) | 23 | 0.44 | 2.74 (0.49) | 3.03 (0.74) | 135 | .26 a | |
| Likely | 3.36 (0.50) | 3.36 (0.36) | 23 | −0.01 | 3.31 (0.41) | 3.31 (0.36) | 135 | .03 | |
| Similar | 3.12 (0.43) | 2.99 (0.36) | 23 | −0.32 | 3.32 (0.39) | 3.33 (0.51) | 135 | .01 | |
| Valence | 4.17 (0.25) | 4.24 (0.35) | 23 | 0.24 | 4.17 (0.25) | 4.24 (0.35) | 135 | .08 | |
| Arousal | 3.40 (0.52) | 3.72 (0.64) | 23 | 0.57 | -- | -- | -- | -- | |
| Internal details (IDs) | |||||||||
| Total ID | 35.67 (11.49) | 24.08 (11.94) | 23 | −1.03a | 26.18 (12.88) | 24.64 (12.27) | 136 | −.06 | |
| ID-Event | 17.98 (7.26) | 12.75 (5.22) | 23 | −0.86a | 14.71 (8.46) | 14.08 (8.14) | 136 | −.03 | |
| ID-Place | -- | -- | -- | -- | 1.95 (1.26) | 1.58 (1.09) | 136 | −.16 | |
| ID-Time | 2.02 (0.84) | 1.33 (0.96) | 23 | −0.79 | 1.14 (1.05) | 0.81 (0.53) | 136 | −.19 | |
| ID-Percept | -- | -- | -- | -- | 3.12 (2.79) | 3.45 (3.43) | 136 | .02 | |
| ID-Em/Tho | 5.08 (2.09) | 3.67 (3.00) | 23 | −0.57 | 5.34 (4.12) | 4.69 (3.00) | 136 | −.06 | |
| External details | 19.92 (8.86) | 20.06 (11.15) | 23 | 0.01 | 15.70 (9.22) | 14.00 (8.78) | 136 | −.08 | |
Note. ID=Internal details (coded episodic detail count from imagining/recalling events for 3 minutes); ID-Percept=Perceptual internal detail subtype; ID-Em/Tho=Emotion or thought-related internal details. External details represent non-episodic details. Fluency represents the total number of events imagined/recalled within 1 minute. All values represent an average across positive and negative event prompts. SR-Likely ratings were not assessed for past events. Bolded comparisons represent those that remain significant after controlling the False Discovery Rate via the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.
a
p < .05 before controlling the FDR