Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Jun 8;15(6):e013987. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.122.013987

Table 3:

Analyses of reproducibility for global MBF and MFR

Standard OSEM reconstruction (N=12)
1st SPECT 2nd SPECT p-value Mean difference
between paired
SPECT scans
Mean
percentage
difference (%)
Global rest flow (mL/min/g) 0.85 (0.52-1.07) 0.70 (0.56-1.04) 0.76 0.048±0.36 3.1%
Corrected rest flow (mL/min/g) 0.89 (0.73-1.29) 0.89 (0.68-1.42) 0.75 0.054±0.48 5.0%
Stress flow (mL/min/g) 1.65 (1.03-2.69) 1.61 (1.19-2.04) 0.81 0.028±0.63 2.6%
Global MFR 2.19 (1.59-2.48) 2.08 (1.78-2.59) 0.84 0.01±0.76 0.7%
Corrected global MFR 1.60 (1.19-2.46) 1.98 (1.22-2.47) 1.00 −0.04±0.87 2.6%
Spline fitting reconstruction (N=14)
1st SPECT 2nd SPECT p-
value
Mean
difference
between
paired SPECT
scans
Mean
percentage
difference
(%)
Global rest flow (mL/min/g) 0.64 (0.51-0.80) 0.62 (0.54-0.86) 0.46 −0.029±0.17 4.6%
Corrected rest flow (mL/min/g) 0.71 (0.68-0.82) 0.74 (0.64-0.88) 0.14 −0.057±0.19 6.6%
Stress flow (mL/min/g) 1.52 (1.02-1.73) 1.13 (1.00-1.95) 0.73 0.014±0.42 1.4%
Global MFR 2.21 (1.76-2.46) 1.83 (1.71-2.40) 0.51 0.12±0.73 5.6%
Corrected global MFR 1.73 (1.40-2.39) 1.65 (1.36-2.12) 0.59 0.14±0.52 7.6%

Myocardial flow reserve (MFR) is calculated as the ratio between stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and that at rest.

*

P-values refer to the comparison between two paired SPECT scans performed within 2 weeks and are based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Mean percentage difference (%) was calculated as absolute change in value divided by the average of the two sequential SPECT measurements, multiplied by 100.

SPECT: single photon emission computed tomgraphy.