Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 10;10(2):e31685. doi: 10.2196/31685

Table 5.

Directed group comparisons of change in the movement tasks between T2 and T3.

Outcome and analysis Control Intervention Comparison

Median (range) Mean (SD) Median (range) Mean (SD) t test (df) W P value r
Δ box lift lumbar spine

ITTa –3.05 (27.86) –3.00 (8.61) 3.37 (45.08) 3.25 (12.10) –1.56 (25) N/Ab .93 0.30

PPc –5.37 (27.80) –5.05 (10.31) 6.69 (45.08) 6.03 (13.00) –1.93 (15) N/A .96 0.45
Δ box lift hip

ITT 0.31 (31.94) –0.14 (8.52) 1.10 (42.64) 0.43 (12.04) –0.14 (25) N/A .44 0.03

PP 2.48 (31.94) 0.84 (10.21) –2.27 (42.09) –2.07 (12.11) –0.53 (15) N/A .70 0.14
Δ waiter bow lumbar spine

ITT –1.12 (15.20) –2.50 (5.22) 1.91 (28.04) 3.16 (8.22) –2.15 (25) N/A .98 0.40

PP –1.12 (15.20) –2.62 (5.51) 1.91 (24.28) 3.07 (7.14) –1.82 (15) N/A .96 0.42
Δ waiter bow hip

ITT –0.85 (25.43) 1.50 (6.83) 1.32 (37.10) –0.48 (10.33) N/A 92 .53d 0.01

PP –1.81 (25.43) 2.46 (8.93) 1.32 (27.99) 0.41 (7.94) N/A 33 .41d 0.07

aITT: intention-to-treat.

bN/A: not applicable.

cPP: per-protocol.

dWilcoxon rank-sum test.