. 2022 Jun 25;22:311. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02393-9

Table 4.

Odds ratios for NAFLD events based on baseline abdominal obesity^a or abdominal obesity^c and metabolically healthy/unhealthy.^b phenotype in females and males

		Odds ratios (95% confidence interval)
	Crude model	Model 1	Model 2	Model 3
Female
MH⁻AO⁻	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
MH⁻AO⁺	18.36 (14.00, 24.07)^*	3.01 (2.12, 4.29)^*	2.48 (1.73, 3.57)^*	2.13 (1.47, 3.09)^*
MH⁺AO⁻	4.67 (3.44, 6.34)^*	2.85 (2.08, 3.91)^*	2.36 (1.68, 3.30)^*	1.37 (0.93, 2.02)
MH⁺AO⁺	82.96 (56.16, 122.55)^*	8.64 (5.34, 13.99)^*	5.84 (3.48, 9.80)^*	2.34 (1.32, 4.17)^*
Male
MH⁻AO⁻	Ref	Ref	Ref	Ref
MH⁻AO⁺	9.27 (7.90, 10.87)^*	2.04 (1.66, 2.50)^*	1.64 (1.31, 2.04)^*	1.42 (1.13, 1.78)^*
MH⁺AO⁻	3.10 (2.67, 3.60)^*	2.26 (1.93, 2.64)^*	1.82 (1.52, 2.18)^*	1.19 (0.97, 1.45)
MH⁺AO⁺	24.80 (20.15, 30.52)^*	4.34 (3.36, 5.59)^*	2.79 (2.10, 3.71)^*	1.47 (1.08, 2.01)^*

Abbreviations as in Table 1;

Model 1 adjusted for age, height, exercise habits, and BMI;

Model 2 adjusted for model 1 plus ALT, AST, GGT, FPG, and HbA1c;

Model 3 adjusted for model 2 plus TC, TG, HDL-C, drinking status, and smoking status;

^*Compared to the MH⁻AO⁻ phenotype, P < 0.05