Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 22;42(25):5047–5057. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2181-21.2022

Table 1.

Differential safety responses: conditioned inhibitor versus standard safety signala

MNI coordinates
Regions x y z KE Z
Inhibitor > standard safety (AX > BC)
    Anterior insular cortex 40 18 −3 85 5.43
    Caudate body −16 6 6 11 5.02
    Posterior cerebellum (Crus II) −37 −75 −46 9 4.59
    Dorsal anterior putamen −27 13 10 5 4.51
    Posterior middle frontal gyrus 42 8 40 6 4.51
    Anterior insular cortex −29 21 0 20 4.49
Standard safety > inhibitor (BC > AX)
    Fusiform gyrus 24 −59 −11 276 5.97
    Postcentral gyrus 29 −26 48 40 4.93
    Subgenual cingulate cortex −3 22 −11 50 4.92
    Basal forebrain 2 0 −8 7 4.61
    Middle temporal gyrus 58 −18 −13 17 4.59
    Fusiform gyrus 40 −40 −21 11 4.55
    Lateral occipital cortex 29 −83 2 30 4.54
    Occipital pole 24 −91 2 11 4.45
    Fusiform gyrus 27 −86 −13 43 4.37
    Precentral gyrus 37 −21 53 16 4.36
    Hippocampus 24 −38 −3 5 4.31
    Occipital pole 27 −90 13 17 4.31
    Posterior cingulate cortex −3 −51 10 6 4.28
    Cerebellum (VI) 26 −48 −21 5 4.26
    Occipital pole −26 −93 3 12 4.25
    Subgenual cingulate cortex 2 29 −6 6 4.21
    Fusiform gyrus −27 −83 −16 17 4.17
    Cerebellum (VIIb) −16 −80 −53 7 4.17
    Lingual gyrus 22 −45 −11 8 4.08
    Ventromedial frontal cortex 0 50 −5 16 3.95

aKE, cluster size in number of voxels; Z, SPM Z scores. Coordinates reported in MNI space. Whole-brain contrasts estimated at PFDR < 0.05.