Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 27;2015(8):CD006291. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006291.pub3

Chittenden 1997.

Methods Randomized controlled trial
Participants Inclusion criterion: patient listed for cataract surgery
 Exclusion criterion: not stated
 Study participants: 35 were enrolled with operation on a single eye
 Study demographics: none stated
Interventions Treatment group: Topical anaesthesia was provided by 0.4% oxybuprocaine hydrochloride (Benoxinate), instilled onto the cornea and the conjunctiva (n = 16)
 Control group: For sub‐Tenon’s technique, Benoxinate drops were instilled as for topical anaesthesia. A small subconjunctival injection of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline was then given in the inferior nasal quadrant approximately 5 mm from the limbus, to raise a small bleb, and a small incision was made in the conjunctiva with
 Wescott spring scissors, which then were used to bluntly dissect deep to Tenon’s capsule to bare the sclera. A blunt 19‐gauge curved cannula was then used to deliver approximately 2 to 3 mL of 2% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline to the posterior sub‐Tenon’s potential space (n = 19)
A superior rectus fixation suture was used in the sub‐Tenon’s group but not in the topical group. The operative technique for both groups was otherwise identical and was performed by 1 surgeon
Outcomes Pain felt intraoperatively (median VAS scores taken as P value)
Notes No pre‐medication was used, and no sedation or other analgesia was required during surgery
Complications were not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk "allocated randomly"; no details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Pain assessor blinded to participant group: not stated
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No participants excluded
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No cross‐over mentioned
Other bias Unclear risk Characteristics of participants not provided