Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 23;10:e13628. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13628

Table 2. SSRT, RT, and ACC results.

Exercise group (28) Non-exercise group (24) Control group (30) p η 2 p
Go RTs (NST) 569.97 ± 101.5** 657.65 ± 69.85††† 506.73 ± 73.41# <0.001 .375
Go RTs (MST) 634.43 ± 71.27*** 712.01 ± 61.63††† 574.89 ± 67.43## <0.001 .413
SSRT 293.51 ± 41.64** 335.64 ± 63.30††† 286.06 ± 18.39 <0.001 .198
Stop Acc 0.52 ± 0.02 0.52 ± 0.01 0.51 ± 0.02 .074 .064
ACC (NST) 0.95 ± 0.02 0.95 ± 0.03††† 0.98 ± 0.02## <0.001 .203
ACC (MST) 0.95 ± 0.04 0.93 ± 0.04††† 0.98 ± 0.0## <0.001 .309
NoGo Error 0.21 ± 0.69 0.29 ± 0.75 0.53 ± 0.94 .295 .030

Notes.

ACC was defined as the ratio between the number of correct responses and the total number of trials presented, calculated from the sum of correct responses. Trials in which the participants missed the target, pressed the button incorrectly, or waited longer than the stimulus presentation in order to improve their stop ACC were excluded as errors.

SSRT
stop-signal reaction time
RT
reaction time
ACC
accuracy
NST
never stop task
MST
maybe stop task
Stop Acc
probability of a successful stop in the MST

Post-hoc analysis results: no-exercise PD vs. healthy control group. ††p < 0.01, †††p < 0.001; exercise PD vs. healthy control group: # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001; exercise PD vs. no-exercise PD group: p < 0.005, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001.