Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;93:104618. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104618

Table 10.

Moderating effect on the relationship between positive affect and review rating.

Dependent Variable: Review Rating
Coeff. SE t Bias-corrected 95% CI
Lower Upper
Positive Affect (PA) 0.3028*** 0.0082 37.0064 0.2868 0.3189
D1 −1.2366*** 0.0725 −17.0661 −1.3787 −1.0945
D2 −1.4223*** 0.0512 −27.7816 −1.5226 −1.3219
Interaction Items
PE × D1 −0.0650* 0.03 −2.1644 −0.1239 −0.0061
PE × D2 −0.1767*** 0.0174 −10.1372 −0.2108 −0.1425
Covariates
Negative Affect −0.0925*** 0.0103 −8.9937 −0.1127 −0.0723
Cognitive Effort −0.0084* 0.0034 −2.4614 −0.0151 −0.0017
Review Length 0.0000 0.0001 −0.2679 −0.0002 0.0002
Reviewer's Contribution 0.0000 0.0000 −1.3771 −0.0001 0.0000
Reviewer's Helpful Votes 0.0002 0.0001 1.6093 0.0000 0.0004
Hotel's Average Rating 0.1246*** 0.0223 5.5898 0.0809 0.1683
Hotel's Review Number 0.0000** 0.0000 2.6779 0.0000 0.0000
Constant 2.8155*** 0.1059 26.5975 2.6079 3.0231

Note: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.

Rebuild as the reference group.

PA × D1 and PA × D2 examined the difference between the conditional effects of positive affect on customer satisfaction in the rebuild and diminish conditions.