Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Aging. 2021 Oct 14;110:88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2021.10.005

Table 3.

Moderating effect of each CR proxy on the relationship between AD-CM and cognition

Model term B SE β p
Model 1
 Education 1.04 0.14 0.32 <.001b
 AD-CM 38.84 4.37 0.36 <.001b
 Education × AD-CM −2.23 1.00 −0.09 .026a
Model 2
 pIQ 0.53 0.06 0.38 <.001b
 AD-CM 34.24 4.20 0.32 <.001b
 pIQ × AD-CM −0.91 0.38 −0.10 .016a
Model 3
 OC 1.85 0.52 0.17 <.001b
 AD-CM 38.75 4.66 0.36 <.001b
 OC × AD-CM −2.77 3.25 −0.04 .40
Model 4
 LCA 5.52 0.94 0.25 <.001b
 AD-CM 36.92 4.48 0.35 <.001b
 LCA × AD-CM −15.63 6.33 −0.10 .014a

Note: Age, sex, and APOE4 carrier status were treated as covariates. B: unstandardized coefficient, β: standardized coefficient.

Key: CR, cognitive reserve; AD-CM, AD-signature region cerebral glucose metabolism; pIQ premorbid Intelligence Quotient; OC, occupational complexity; LCA, lifetime cognitive activity; SE, standard error; APOE4, apolipoprotein E ε4.

a

p < 0.05.

b

p < 0.001.