Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 27.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Nov 27;112:106634. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106634

Table 3.

Study outcome measures and the pre-specified clinically important difference.

Outcome Definition/Measure Data Source/Timing Important Difference
Patient (Panel) Level (Aim 1)
Screening Rates Proportion of eligible men screened in last 12 months EHR data warehouse at baseline, year 1 and year 2 25% increase from 6% Usual Care
Medication Initiation Proportion of screened men meeting treatment threshold who receive at least 1 prescription EHR, intervention period year 1 and year 2, non-VA medication lists by chart abstraction. 30% increase from 55% Usual Care
Medication Implementation Days of medication dispensed divided by follow-up days Pharmacy dispensing records, for patients started within prior year at baseline, year 1 and 2. Non-VA medication lists by chart abstraction. 20% increase in MPR≥80%40 from 30% Usual Care
Medication Discontinuation Time between first prescription dispensing date and the date of first medication possession gap of ≥3 months 20% difference
Harms Proportion of men started on oral medication for new GI distress in 3 months Subtrochanteric fractures or Osteonecrosis of the jaw ICD10 codes, new prescription for proton pump inhibitor or H2 blocker 15% increase from 30% Usual Care >expected 1/50,000 patient years treatment
Fractures (exploratory) All clinical fractures excluding facial, digital EHR, confirmed by chart abstraction 10% decrease from 2.5/100 person years Usual Care
Provider/Facility Level (Aim 2)
DXA volume DXA orders/ 1000 patients/year, by intervention group EHR, year 2
Bone Disease clinic volume Consults/ 1000 patients/year, by intervention group EHR, year 2
Primary care team satisfaction, time Nominal Group Technique at Routine Staff meeting Measured at 2 years
Health System/Policy Level (Aim 3)
Program Cost Effectiveness Cost/quality adjusted life years (QALY) of the screening models compared to usual care Markov model with above outcomes, fracture rates, cost and quality of life from VA and medical literature Probability of cost/QALY >80% at thresholds of $50,000, $100,000, $200,00041

EHR = Electronic Health Record; MPR = Medication Possession Ratio