Table 3.
Technique | Advantages | Drawbacks | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|
Imaging techniques | |||
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) |
- Detection of nanoparticles distributed in intracellular and extracellular thin fragments of tissues - Differentiation nanoparticles located in different structures - Information on biodistribution and MNPs degradation ways in the organism |
- Costly preparation procedures - Information only from specific, very limited areas of tissue |
[161, 162] |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) |
- Noninvasive and repeatable method - Visualizing and distinguishing individual soft tissue - Used in examinations of practically the entire body - Possibility of continuous imaging of moving objects in real time |
- Necessity of application a very strong magnetic field - Quite expensive technique |
[164−168, 171] |
Magnetic Particle Imaging (MPI) |
- Prominent contrast and signal-to-noise ratio - The selected region can be rapidly and continuously detected for real-time imaging of MNPs distribution |
- Necessity to develop and apply the appropriate MPI tracers | [79, 169, 170, 173–177] |
Spectroscopy techniques | |||
Electron Spin Resonance (ESR) |
- Characterization of physical properties of various nanomaterials - Observation the differences resulting from interaction between the material surface and environment - Differentiation between the endogenous and administered iron |
- Results for only specific time points - The necessity to section the tissue samples in to 2 mm3 cubes to fit in the thin ESR glass tubes |
[158–160] |
Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) techniques coupled with Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-AES) or with Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS) | - Detection of iron present in tissues at very low concentrations |
- Destructive methods - No differentiation between the endogenous and administered iron |
[185–189] |
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) |
- Sensitive and nondestructive method which results in a direct measurement of the MNPs not requiring further data analysis - Performed at low magnetic fields and frequencies, offering the advantage that a much larger sample volume can measured at room temperature - EPR can be combined with MRI which benefits among others in cell tracking studies |
- Limitations of the method result from the instability of paramagnetic centers in the tested substances and the reduced sensitivity of their detection for samples containing water | [190, 191] |
Ferromagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (FRS) |
- Powerful method for the quantitative determination of internal fields in ferro- or ferrimagnetic materials and nanostructures - Shape of the FMR spectrum contains valuable information about the internal fields in the sample |
- Structural information cannot be obtained in a straight-forward way from spectra | [192] |
Alternating Current (AC) Susceptibility (ACS) |
- Non-invasive method - Tissue sample preparation is minimal and no separation or isolation procedures are needed for the simultaneous quantification of several iron-containing species - The large amounts of tissue can be characterized each time so that representative results are easily obtained |
- The need to use ex vivo samples - Time, costs and the relatively low availability of these type of instruments |
[181–184] |
Magnetometry techniques | |||
Magnetic Susceptibility Measurement (MSM) |
- A fast and easy method to quantify MNPs in convenient and accurate way in different media - There is no need of any preliminary modification of the samples - MSM values are only influenced by the iron from magnetic particles and not by free iron in solution |
- The same magnetic particles for the calibration and experiments must be used, magnetic susceptibility being sensitive to the size of the magnetic core | [25] |
Technique with the use of Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) |
- Very sensitive technique - These instruments are used in MRI and magnetoencephalography (MEG) for recording the very weak fields, which are produced by electrical currents flowing in the brain’s neural networks |
- The noise level is determined by environmental sources, except in those experiments where the SQUID and its signal source are enclosed in a superconducting shield | [193] |
Magnetic Particle Quantification (MPQ) |
- Method offers highly sensitive, room-temperature and rapid quantification of nanoparticle–cell interactions - The low invasiveness and high resolution - Possibility of measuring very low amounts of the nanoparticles without destruction of sample - Llow amplitude and frequencies used in MPQ protect the MNPs from heating and agglomeration |
- Necessity to use only MNPs with nonlinear magnetization - MPQ method cannot distinguish the processes of particle dissolution, transformation of iron oxides to biological forms of iron, excretion of particles from the organism, etc. |
[178–180] |