Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;252:109278. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109278

Table 4.

Evaluation of the explainable MIL strategy (bag size=100).

Method ACC(%) Precision(%) Recall(%) F1 Score(%) AUC(%)
ResNet18-Voting 88.97
[85.52,92.76]
85.85
[80.49,92.03]
90.37
[85.14,94.85]
88.05
[83.74,92.02]
90.08
[86.30,92.18]
Gated-Attention 94.48
[92.07,97.24]
95.89
[92.28,98.73]
93.24
[91.61,97.08]
94.55
[83.74,92.02]
94.63
[91.65,97.08]
EM-Cls 96.73
[95.00,98.80]
97.22
[95.09,100.0]
94.59
[90.21,98.14]
95.89
[93.06,98.17]
96.98
[93.80,98.99]

The upper and lower bounds of 95% confidence interval are shown in [].