Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Thromb Res. 2021 Nov 14;213(Suppl 1):S113–S119. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.11.004

Table 3.

Population-based studies evaluating survival with warfarin compared with other anticoagulants in patients with cancers.

Data sources Study period Population Cancer types N Adjusted hazard ratio for cancer-related or overall mortality (95%CI)
Kinnunen 2017[32] Finnish Cancer Registry and national
reimbursement database
1995 - 2015 Men aged 55-67 Prostate 1074 Warfarin
978 Other AC
Warfarin users vs. non-warfarin AC users: 1.01 (0.71-1.44)
Kinnunen 2019[34] Finnish Cancer Registry and national reimbursement database 1995 - 2016 Men aged 55-67 Lung, gastric, colorectal, CNS, NHL, hepatic, pancreatic, renal, bladder 17826 Warfarin
12326 LMWH
8595 Other AC
Warfarin users vs. non-warfarin AC users: 0.45 (0.41 – 0.50)*
Kinnunen 2020 [35] Finnish Cancer Registry and national reimbursement database 1995 - 2015 Women median age 59 – 72 Breast 914 Warfarin
906 Other AC
Warfarin users vs. non-warfarin AC users: 0.88 (0.80 – 0.98)*
Chiasakul 2021 [36] SEER-Medicare 2007 - 2016 Aged ≥66 with VTE Gastric, colorectal, pancreatic, lung, ovarian, or brain 4853 LMWH
4853 Warfarin
Warfarin vs. LMWH: 0.86 (0.83 – 0.90)*

RR, rate ratio; HR, hazard ratio; AC, anticoagulant; VTE, venous thromboembolism

*

denotes statistically significant results