Table 3.
Variable | Overall N (%) | Default Beverage (N=18) N (%) | Nutritional Standards (N=1) N (%) | Toy Restriction (N=2) N (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Jurisdictionb | ||||
City | 14 (70) | 14 (78) | 1 (100) | 0 (0) |
County | 3 (15) | 1 (6) | 0 (0) | 2 (100) |
State | 3 (15) | 3 (17) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Political affiliation of state governor | ||||
Democrat | 15 (75) | 15 (83) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Republican | 5 (25) | 3 (17) | 1 (100) | 2 (100) |
Other | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Political affiliation of local executivec | ||||
Democrat | 12 (71) | 10 (67) | 1 (100) | 2 (100) |
Republican | 1 (6) | 1 (7) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Other | 4 (24) | 4 (26) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Political affiliation of bill sponsor | ||||
Democrat | 15 (75) | 13 (72) | 1 (100) | 2 (100) |
Nonpartisan | 1 (5) | 1 (6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Unable to determine | 4 (20) | 4 (22) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Decision-making bodyd | ||||
State Health Dept | 3 (15) | 3 (17) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Local Board of Supervisors | 3 (15) | 1 (6) | 0 (0) | 2 (100) |
City Health Dept | 5 (25) | 5 (28) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
City Council | 4 (20) | 4 (22) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
City Board of Health | 2 (10) | 2 (11) | 1 (100) | 0 (0) |
City Dept of Licenses & Inspections | 1 (5) | 1 (6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
City Health Initiative | 1 (5) | 1 (6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
City Housing & Human Services | 1 (5) | 1 (6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Preemptive language usede,f | 1 (33) | 1 (33) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Unanimous passage | 7 (35) | 7 (39) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Time from enactment to effective date | ||||
Less than 1 month | 2 (10) | 2 (11) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
1 month | 5 (25) | 5 (28) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
3 months | 6 (30) | 5 (28) | 1 (100) | 1 (50) |
5 months | 1 (5) | 1 (6) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
6 months | 3 (15) | 3 (17) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
12 months | 3 (15) | 2 (11) | 0 (0) | 1 (50) |
Fiscal note attached to billg | 10 (50) | 9 (50) | 0 (0) | 1 (50) |
Policy note attached to billh | 2 (10) | 2 (11) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
A bill may have more than one provision (e.g., a healthy default beverage provision and a nutritional standards provision).
Ordinances in San Francisco were passed at both the city and county levels. Here, the ordinance is counted only as a county-level bill because the legislation encompasses the city as well.
The denominator only consists of local bills (n=17) at the city and county level who may have a local executive such as a city mayor or county executive.
The decision-making body consists of the group or agency responsible for the rule-making portion of the policy.
The denominator only consists of statutes (n=3) where state preemption may affect local laws.
“Preemptive language” refers to legislative language at the state level that nullifies or limits the scope of a municipal ordinance or authority.
A fiscal note is a note attached to the legislative bill for review and is defined as short reports that provide an estimate of a bill’s fiscal impact on the State, local governments, and small businesses.
A policy note is a note attached to the legislative bill for review and is defined as short reports that describe the current state of the law and provide background analysis of the law.