Abstract
Soft-bodied slow-moving sea creatures such as sea stars and sea cucumbers lack an adaptive immune system and have instead evolved the ability to make specialized protective chemicals (glycosylated steroids and triterpenes) as part of their innate immune system. This raises the intriguing question of how these biosynthetic pathways have evolved. Sea star saponins are steroidal, while those of the sea cucumber are triterpenoid. Sterol biosynthesis in animals involves cyclization of 2,3-oxidosqualene to lanosterol by the oxidosqualene cyclase (OSC) enzyme lanosterol synthase (LSS). Here we show that sea cucumbers lack LSS and instead have two divergent OSCs that produce triterpene saponins and that are likely to have evolved from an ancestral LSS by gene duplication and neofunctionalization. We further show that sea cucumbers make alternate sterols that confer protection against self-poisoning by their own saponins. Collectively, these events have enabled sea cucumbers to evolve the ability to produce saponins and saponin-resistant sterols concomitantly.
Subject terms: Enzymes, Biosynthesis, Natural products, Chemical ecology
Sea stars and sea cucumbers biosynthesize protective glycosylated steroids and triterpenes via divergent oxidosqualene cyclases (OSCs) that produce these distinct saponins in different species as well as in different tissues of a single species.
Main
Echinoderms lack adaptive immunity and therefore rely exclusively on innate immunity for growth and survival in the hostile benthic environment1. As part of this innate immunity, soft-bodied slow-moving echinoderms such as sea cucumbers and sea stars produce specialized metabolites (glycosylated steroids and triterpenes, also known as saponins) that provide chemical defense against potential assailants2,3. By contrast, the closely related sea urchins are protected by spines and do not make such compounds4 (Fig. 1a). When stressed, as a first line of defense, some sea cucumbers expel sticky threads called Cuvierian tubules, which entangle their enemies and immobilize them5,6. Immobilized victims eventually die due to the saponins of these tubules6. In addition to defense, saponins also have other biological functions in sea creatures, including in reproduction, spawning and chemical communication with symbionts7–9. Many animals use toxins as chemical defenses. These protective compounds are usually either sequestered from food or produced by endosymbionts. By contrast, echinoderms biosynthesize their toxins themselves10. Saponins have antifungal activity that is attributed to their ability to form complexes with membrane sterols such as cholesterol (5), therefore causing membrane permeabilization and cell death. Sea stars and sea cucumbers make alternate, unusual sterols (lathosterol (7) and 14α-methylcholest-9(11)-en-3β-ol (11)) that protect against potential self-poisoning by endogenous saponins (Fig. 1b)11. Sea cucumbers are a food delicacy in South Asia, and their extracts (of which saponins are important bioactive components) are highly valued for their medicinal properties. For these reasons, sea cucumber cultivation is a multimillion-dollar industry12. Despite the biological and commercial importance of sea cucumber saponins, the biosynthetic pathways for these compounds and how they have evolved in marine animals are unknown.
Sea star saponins are steroidal (for example, asterosaponin A1 (8)), while those made by sea cucumbers are triterpenoid (for example, holotoxin A1 (13)), the major difference being the presence or absence of methyl groups at carbon positions C4 and C14 (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1). Both types of compounds originate from the linear precursor 2,3-oxidosqualene (1)13 (Fig. 1b). In animals, the first committed step in sterol biosynthesis involves cyclization of 1 to lanosterol (2) by OSC enzymes known as LSSs (Fig. 1b). Lanosterol is subsequently converted to the essential sterol cholesterol, which also serves as a precursor for steroidal saponins in sea stars. Triterpenoid saponins are widespread in plants but rare in animals, sea cucumbers being a noteworthy exception. In plants, the OSC gene family has expanded and diversified to produce an array of diverse triterpene scaffolds, with an average of 10–15 OSC genes per diploid plant genome13. By contrast, animals normally have a single OSC gene that encodes the LSS required for the synthesis of essential sterols13. The enzymes for the biosynthesis of steroids and triterpenoids and the saponins derived from these scaffolds in marine animals are not known (Fig. 1b). Here we take a genome-mining approach to investigate the origins of steroids and triterpenoids in marine animals. We identify candidate OSC genes from sea stars, sea urchins and sea cucumbers, functionally characterize these by heterologous expression in yeast and determine their product specificities (for sterol precursors or triterpene scaffolds). We further investigate the likely biological roles of two divergent non-LSS OSCs in sea cucumbers. Our study provides insights into the emergence of triterpene biosynthesis in the sea cucumber lineage and the coevolution of this with the ability to produce unusual sterols that are saponin resistant and therefore are likely to provide protection against self-poisoning.
Results
Discovery and functional analysis of echinoderm OSCs
A sea cucumber genome sequence has recently been released14. To investigate the occurrence and types of OSCs in echinoderms and the holozoan lineage more broadly, we mined the sequenced genomes of sea stars15,16, sea urchins16 and sea cucumbers14,17 for predicted OSC genes using human LSS as a template (Supplementary Table 1). Phylogenetic analysis revealed two distinct clades within the Echinodermata: OSC genes from sea stars and sea urchins group together in clade I, while those from sea cucumbers form a distinct cluster, which we have named clade II (Extended Data Fig. 1). The differentiation of these latter OSC genes from those in clade I is suggestive of functional divergence (Extended Data Fig. 1). Two OSC genes were recovered from each of three different sea cucumber species. Sea cucumbers are unusual in having two OSC genes; all other animals have only one (Supplementary Table 2).
The genes for the OSCs marked with red asterisks in Extended Data Fig. 1 were cloned, and their functions were determined by expression in the LSS-deficient yeast strain Gil77 (ref. 18). This enabled us to evaluate the OSCs for their ability to complement LSS deficiency in vivo and also to investigate the nature of the 1 cyclization products generated by gas chromatography (GC)–MS analysis of yeast cell extracts. OSCs were expressed under the control of the galactose-responsive GAL1 promoter, which is repressed in the presence of glucose. In yeast, lanosterol is the precursor for the biosynthesis of the essential sterol ergosterol18. In the presence of exogenously supplied ergosterol and glucose, all yeast strains containing the different OSC constructs grew (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Fig. 2a). In the presence of galactose and the absence of exogenous ergosterol, two of the OSCs tested (sea star Patiria miniata LSS and sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus LSS) complemented the growth of Gil77, suggesting that they are functional LSSs (Fig. 1c). GC–MS analysis confirmed the presence of lanosterol in extracts from the strains expressing these two OSCs (Fig. 1d and Extended Data Fig. 2b,f).
None of the OSCs from sea cucumbers restored Gil77 growth in the absence of ergosterol (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Fig. 2a). This may be because either they were not expressed in functional form or alternatively because they make products other than lanosterol. GC–MS analysis of yeast extracts (cultured with ergosterol and galactose supplementation) revealed that two OSCs from the Apostichopus japonicus sea cucumber accessions (A. japonicus LDSa and A. japonicus LDSb) both yielded a new peak with a retention time of 21.6 min (Fig. 1e and Extended Data Fig. 2c,e,g). Large-scale yeast expression, purification and NMR characterization showed this to be 9β-lanosta-7,24-dienol (lanostadienol (4)), a very closely related isomer of lanosterol with a double bond at the Δ7(8) carbon position as opposed to the Δ8(9) position (Supplementary Figs. 2a–d and 3a,b and Supplementary Table 3). These OSCs were therefore named lanostadienol synthases (LDSs). No activity was observed for the Parastichopus parvimensis sea cucumber candidate OSC P. parvimensis LDS (Fig. 1e). GC–MS analysis of extracts from yeast expressing P. parvimensis PS and A. japonicus PSa and A. japonicus PSb revealed a new peak that did not match the retention time of either lanosterol or lanostadienol (Fig. 1f and Extended Data Fig. 2d,h), which was subsequently shown by NMR to be 8β-lanosta-9,24-dienol (parkeol (3)) (Supplementary Fig. 3c and Supplementary Table 4). Parkeol is another close isomer of lanosterol and lanostadienol with the relevant double bond at the Δ9(11) position. These OSCs were therefore named parkeol synthases (PSs). There is no report of a dedicated lanostadienol synthase (LDS) as yet from any other organism. A single PS of unknown biological function has been reported in rice19. The identification of a dedicated PS in sea cucumbers is suggestive of a role for this enzyme in parkeol-type triterpene saponin biosynthesis as shown in Fig. 1b, right. The role of LDS in sea cucumbers is unknown.
Analysis of sea cucumber saponins
To investigate the roles of PS and LDS OSCs, we analyzed different sea cucumber tissues for antifungal activity, saponins and OSC gene expression to establish whether expression of LDS and PS genes is correlated with bioactivity and/or saponin content. Sea cucumber saponins are highly antifungal2. We first evaluated extracts from different adult tissues of P. parvimensis and A. japonicus for inhibition of yeast growth as a sensitive but indirect measure of saponin content. Strong antifungal activity was detected for extracts from the tentacles, body walls and tube feet but not for the intestines, muscles or male or female gonads, with similar results for both sea cucumber species (Fig. 2a, top).
To facilitate saponin identification in crude extracts, we isolated pure saponins from adult P. parvimensis sea cucumbers by large-scale extraction and purification, coupled with yeast growth inhibition and chromatographic analysis. Of the fractions tested, fractions 5 and 6 showed strong yeast growth inhibition (Extended Data Fig. 3a–c). These fractions each contained two major saponins as revealed by LC–MS (negative ion mode) (Extended Data Fig. 3d). These ions were further subjected to high-resolution LC–MS and MS2 analysis using a Q Exactive Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mass fragmentation of saponin m/z 1,393.6707 revealed it to be dihydro holotoxin A1 (12), and mass fragmentation of saponin m/z 1,391.6461 revealed it to be holotoxin A1 (Extended Data Fig. 3e), previously known saponins from P. parvimensis20 and A. japonicus21. However, mass fragmentation revealed m/z 1,379.6342 and m/z 1,377.6354 to be new holotoxins (Extended Data Fig. 3e). These two new holotoxins each have two quinovose sugar residues as opposed to the single quinovose in all other currently known holotoxins20,21 and hence were named dihydro holotoxin J (m/z 1,379.6342, 14) and holotoxin J (m/z 1,377.6354, 15) (Extended Data Fig. 3e). All four saponins are parkeol type with Δ9(11) functionality in the aglycone scaffold, and their structures are clearly consistent with the high-resolution LC–MS2 fragmentation pattern shown in Extended Data Fig. 3e.
Using these saponins as standards, we next analyzed the tissue extracts for saponin content. LC–MS2 analysis confirmed the presence of parkeol-type saponins with Δ9(11) functionality in the aglycone scaffold, consistent with a role for PS in saponin biosynthesis in these tissues (Fig. 2a and Extended Data Fig. 4a). These included dihydro holotoxin A1, holotoxin A1, dihydro holotoxin J and holotoxin J. Holotoxin A1 and holotoxin J were found in extracts from the tentacles of both species. Holotoxin A1 was also detected in extracts from the body wall and tube feet of A. japonicus, while dihydro holotoxin J was predominant in extracts from the corresponding tissue types of P. parvimensis (Fig. 2a, middle, and Extended Data Fig. 4a). Selective accumulation of saponins in outer epidermal tissues (that is, tentacles, body wall and tube feet) may be anticipated to provide a first line of defense against pathogens or predators in the ocean. In fact, it has been shown that sea cucumber extracts inhibit the growth of surface-growing and pathogenic fungi of sea cucumbers, consistent with a direct role in defense22. Saponins were not detected in extracts from the intestines, muscles or male or female gonads of either species, in line with the lack of antifungal activity in these extracts (Fig. 2a, top and middle, and Extended Data Fig. 4a). Analysis of transcript levels of the two A. japonicus OSC genes revealed that A. japonicus PSb was expressed at high levels in saponin-producing tissues, while A. japonicus LDSb was not, consistent with a role for PS in saponin biosynthesis (Fig. 2a, bottom). Neither OSC gene was expressed in the intestines or muscles, tissues that lack detectable levels of saponins. By contrast, both A. japonicus PSb and A. japonicus LDSb were highly expressed in the gonads, but gonad extracts had little or no inhibitory activity toward yeast, suggesting that PS and LDS may have alternate roles in this tissue (for example, in steroid hormone biosynthesis or other functions) (Fig. 2a).
The early growth stages of A. japonicus show distinct waves of expression of A. japonicus LDSb and A. japonicus PSb in the transition from zygote to juvenile (Extended Data Fig. 5a, bottom). Expression of OSC genes during the planktotrophic stage of larval development, in which larvae actively feed on algae and plankton in the top water column, could be associated with the production of saponins that counter predation. Compared to extracts from adult stages, extracts from the early growth stage showed strong yeast growth inhibition as well as distinct saponin peaks in LC–MS (Extended Data Fig. 4b–d, Extended Data Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 4). NMR structural characterization of these saponins was not feasible due to low abundance of the compounds and source material. However, based on high-resolution LC–MS and MS2 analyses and correlation with A. japonicus LDSb expression at these growth stages compared to adult stages, we identified these as new saponins, ovatoxins A–D (17–20) (Extended Data Fig. 5b). Because ovatoxin A–D accumulation correlates with A. japonicus LDSb expression, these compounds are likely LDS type with Δ7(8) functionality in the saponin aglycone, providing evidence for a role for LDS in the biosynthesis of previously undescribed saponins in early growth stages (Fig. 3). Under laboratory conditions, sea cucumber eggs are known to be highly unpalatable to predatory fish and tunicates23, again suggesting a direct defense role of inherent saponins in early growth stages. Collectively, these results indicate that PS and LDS have distinct roles in the biosynthesis of parkeol-type saponins with Δ9(11) functionality and LDS-type saponins with Δ7(8) functionality, respectively (Fig. 3), as part of the sea cucumber chemical defense arsenal.
Sea cucumbers make unusual sterols
Saponins form complexes with cholesterol, thus causing loss of membrane integrity and cell death. However, sea cucumbers have evolved the ability to produce high levels of lathosterol and 11 sterols rather than cholesterol, which may enable them to be resistant to their own saponins (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b). Sea urchins do not make saponins and lack lathosterol and 11 sterols (Extended Data Fig. 6a). External application of sea cucumber saponins to sea urchin eggs results in egg mortality24,25. By contrast, application of sea star saponins to sea star eggs does not cause mortality, implying that intrinsic lathosterol can confer resistance to saponin self-toxicity25. The alternative double-bond positions (Δ7(8) and Δ9(11)) as well as the conformation of the acyclic tail of lathosterol and 11 sterols may hinder the formation of stable interactions with saponins in membranes when compared with Δ5 cholesterol (Extended Data Fig. 6c).
The genes required for lathosterol and 11 sterol biosynthesis are currently unknown. As knowledge of lathosterol and 11 sterol biosynthesis will be critical for understanding how sea cucumbers have evolved saponin resistance, we predicted the biosynthetic route to these sterols based on pathway intermediates characterized in this study and enzymes reported in the literature with the aim of identifying the corresponding genes (Extended Data Fig. 6a,d, Supplementary Fig. 5a–e and Supplementary Tables 5–8). First, in 11 biosynthesis, detection of dihydroparkeol (9) and 4α,14α-dimethylcholest-9(11)-en-3β-ol (10) (Extended Data Fig. 6a) intermediates implies that 11 is derived from the triterpene precursor parkeol through (1) side-chain double-bond reduction of parkeol by a sterol C24 reductase (DHCR24) leading to dihydroparkeol and (2) eventual C4 demethylation of dihydroparkeol mediated by the C4-demethylation complex (SC4MOL, Nsdh and HSD17B7), which results in formation of the final 11 sterol (Fig. 3). The sterol 11 is unique to sea cucumbers, implying that it has a special role therein26. Secondly, in lathosterol biosynthesis, in the absence of a cholesterol-biosynthetic pathway, sea cucumbers must take up cholesterol from their diet, whereas sea stars synthesize cholesterol and also convert de novo synthesized or diet-derived Δ5 sterols to Δ7 sterols (Figs. 2b and 3 and Extended Data Fig. 7a,b). Detection of cholestanol (6) suggests that cholesterol 5α-reduction (mediated by a common 5α-sterol reductase (5αR)) precedes C7 desaturation in lathosterol biosynthesis (Fig. 3 and Extended Data Fig. 6a). A literature search revealed that a bona fide cholesterol 7 desaturase (C7D, known as DAF36 in nematodes) is known in nematodes27. Using this as an inquiry sequence, we identified C7D hits in echinoderms but not in humans (Fig. 2b). Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the echinoderm hits grouped with the nematode DAF36 (Extended Data Fig. 7c). Key amino acid residues known to be required for function were also conserved, suggesting that the echinoderm hits were likely sterol C7 desaturases (Extended Data Fig. 7d). C7D and PS play crucial roles in lathosterol and 11 sterol biosynthesis, respectively (Figs. 2b and 3). Collectively, our results suggest that PS and LDS have distinct and non-overlapping roles in vivo. To investigate this further, we carried out whole-mount mRNA in situ hybridization of P. parvimensis embryos and larvae to establish the spatial expression patterns of the PS and LDS OSC genes. In 2-d-old embryos, P. parvimensis LDS expression was detected in the ciliary bands, while P. parvimensis PS was expressed in the mouth region, consistent with distinct roles for these two OSCs (Supplementary Fig. 6a–c).
Mutational analysis of determinants of OSC product specificity
Our results suggest that PS is responsible for the first committed step in the biosynthesis of Δ9(11) saponins and Δ9(11) sterols and that LDS is responsible for Δ7(8) saponin biosynthesis (Fig. 3). Unraveling the evolutionary origins of LDS and PS may shed light on the origin of Δ9(11) and Δ7(8) triterpene saponins and Δ9(11) sterols in sea cucumbers. To this end, functional divergence of the LDS and PS OSCs from the highly conserved ancestral LSSs prompted us to investigate the active site residues of these enzymes. The cyclization products generated by LSS, LDS and PS enzymes differ in the position of the double bond in the tetracyclic region. The different isomeric products are a result of different termination points of 1,2-shift sequences originating from a common tetracyclic cationic intermediate (the protosteryl cation). This implies that these OSCs likely differ or diverge either in their kinetic promotion of the final deprotonation (which gives the neutral alkene) or in their ability to stabilize the relevant preceding cations (Extended Data Fig. 8a). To determine whether these OSCs differ in active site amino acid residues that might govern the site of deprotonation or C8 or C9 cation stabilization, we developed homology models for P. miniata LSS, S. purpuratus LSS, P. parvimensis LDS and P. parvimensis PS using the human LSS–lanosterol (Protein Data Bank 1W6K) complex as a template28. Superimposition of the models revealed a single amino acid residue within 5 Å of lanosterol that differed in LSS (444F), LDS (444Q) and PS (436L) (Fig. 4a and Extended Data Fig. 8b). This revealed that residue 444 is in a particularly promising position to control C8 and C9 cation stabilization directly, which in turn could influence the position of deprotonation during the reaction pathway (Fig. 4a). Next, using structure-based sequence alignment, we verified variability at the 444th residue position across echinoderm as well as the holozoan lineages. Comparison of amino acid residue positions within 5 Å of lanosterol (highlighted in yellow) revealed that residue 444 alone differentiated LDSs and PSs from LSSs (Fig. 4b and Extended Data Fig. 8b,c). Residues 232H and 503Y were within hydrogen bonding distance and are believed to form a catalytic dyad responsible for deprotonation in the formation of lanosterol28 (Fig. 4a). H232 and 503Y were invariant across LSS, LDS and PS OSCs, suggesting that variation at residue 444 alone determines product specificity (Fig. 4b). Natural selection may therefore have favored this mutation, leading to the origin of the divergent OSCs LDS and PS and to the emergence of Δ9(11) (12–15) and Δ7(8) (17–20) triterpene saponins as well as 11 sterol in sea cucumbers.
Next, we examined experimentally in three ways whether the nature of the amino acid residue at position 444 does indeed determine the product specificity of LSS, LDS and PS enzymes. First, an amino acid residue in the structurally homologous position was replaced with a residue from the equivalent position of another OSC. A. japonicus PSa was chosen as a representative PS, and mutant versions with the equivalent LSS or LDS residues (A. japonicus PSa-L436F and A. japonicus PSa-L436Q) were generated and expressed in yeast. As expected, the wild-type A. japonicus PSa enzyme neither restored the ability of Gil77 to grow in the absence of exogenous ergosterol nor yielded lanosterol (Fig. 4c,d and Extended Data Fig. 8d). However, the mutant A. japonicus PSa-L436F variant could restore the growth of Gil77 (Fig. 3c), indicating that it is able to produce lanosterol in vivo. GC–MS results confirmed the presence of lanosterol in extracts from yeast expressing this mutant PS (Fig. 4d and Extended Data Fig. 8d). The mutant variant A. japonicus PSa-L436Q synthesizes lanostadienol in addition to parkeol but not lanosterol (Fig. 4d and Extended Data Fig. 8d). Second, we introduced corresponding mutations in S. purpuratus LSS to determine whether these mutations recapitulated PS- or LDS-like activity in LSS. The S. purpuratus LSS wild-type enzyme does not synthesize detectable levels of parkeol or lanostadienol. Interestingly, however, the S. purpuratus LSSF440L mutant synthesizes lanostadienol in addition to lanosterol, and the S. purpuratus LSSF440Q mutant synthesizes lanostadienol in addition to lanosterol (Extended Data Fig. 8e,f). Third, we investigated whether any other OSCs in the UniProt proteome29 have Q or L at the position equivalent to 444 instead of the conserved F. An exhaustive search revealed five hits, all with L at this position (Extended Data Fig. 9a). These five hits, all of which are proteins of unknown function, fell into the category of bacterial group I OSCs based on our phylogenetic analysis (Extended Data Fig. 9b). We cloned one of these from Gemmata obscuriglobus strain DSM5831T (G. obscuriglobus OSC) and expressed it in yeast. GC–MS analysis revealed that G. obscuriglobus PS synthesizes parkeol as we predicted, confirming the pivotal role of 444L in parkeol product specificity (Fig. 4e and Extended Data Fig. 9c). Together, our results clearly implicate residue 444 in OSC product specificity and are consistent with a scenario in which LDS and PS enzymes have evolved from an ancestral sea cucumber LSS by gene duplication and neofunctionalization. The PS and LDS genes are in tandem in the P. parvimensis and A. japonicus sea cucumber genomes, suggesting that they may have arisen by gene duplication and divergence, and this may have occurred in parallel with sterol 14α-demethylase (CYP51) loss in sea cucumbers (Extended Data Fig. 10a–d). CYP51 enzymes are highly conserved across the animal, plant and fungal kingdoms and govern a key step in essential sterol biosynthesis30. However, unlike sea stars and sea urchins, sea cucumbers lack a CYP51 gene.
Discussion
Here we show that sea cucumbers lack LSS, an OSC that is essential for normal sterol biosynthesis in animals and that is highly conserved across other members of the animal kingdom. Instead, they have two divergent OSCs (PS and LDS) that respectively produce parkeol-type triterpene saponins in epidermal tissues and a new class of lanostadienol-type saponins (ovatoxins) in juvenile tissues and that are likely to have evolved from an ancestral LSS by gene duplication and neofunctionalization. Saponins are able to form complexes with membrane sterols, thus causing membrane disruption with associated cell death. Our results show that sea cucumbers produce high levels of the unusual sterols lathosterol and 11 sterols, rather than the typical animal sterol cholesterol. These sterols are saponin resistant and hence are likely to confer protection against self-poisoning. Collectively, our studies suggest that sea cucumbers have evolved the ability to produce saponins as well as saponin-resistant sterols concomitantly. The discovery of the key enzymes LSS, PS, LDS and C7D should now expedite the discovery and characterization of other downstream enzymes required for saponin biosynthesis in the sea cucumber.
Methods
Sea cucumber sampling and maintenance
Culturing and collecting adult tissues and early-stage samples of P. parvimensis
Adult animals of P. parvimensis sea cucumbers were collected off the southern Californian coast, USA. Spawning was induced in adult sea cucumbers by intra-coelomic injection of 100 nM NGLWY-amide, followed by heat shock in room temperature sea water as described previously31. Fertilization was conducted by mixing freshly shed eggs with dilute sperm. Embryos were cultured in artificial seawater at 15 °C until the desired stage. Late gastrula–larva-stage embryos were collected at 2 d post-fertilization (dpf), and early auricularia larvae were collected at 4 dpf. Nine different adult tissues were collected from P. parvimensis sea cucumbers and flash-frozen until further use.
Culturing and collecting adult tissues and early-stage samples of A. japonicus
Adult A. japonicus sea cucumbers were collected from the coast of Liaoning, China and acclimatized in a seawater aquarium (~500 l) at 15 °C for 1 week before use. They were fed once a day during this period with mixed feed ingredients including 40% fresh sea mud, 30% Sargassum thunbergii and 30% sea cucumber compound feed (An-yuan). Major adult organs (intestine, tentacle, muscle, body wall, male gonads, female gonads and tube feet) were dissected from three healthy adult sea cucumbers and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for further use. To obtain the early-stage materials of A. japonicus, artificial fertilization of sexually matured adults was performed as described previously32. Larval culture was developed based on a procedure described previously32. Embryos (zygote, cleavages, blastulae and gastrulae), larvae (auricularia, doliolaria and pentactula) and juveniles were sampled and flash-frozen until use.
Oxidosqualene cyclase mining
Genome and transcriptome resources14–17,33,34 were used to mine for predicted echinoderm OSC sequences. Echinobase16 hosts genome sequences and ovary transcriptome data for diverse species of Echinodermata, including sea urchins, sand dollars, sea stars and sea cucumbers. These available echinoderm sequence resources16 were mined using the human LSS sequence as a template (UniProt ID P48449)28, and predicted full-length OSC open reading frames (ORFs) (~2.2 kb; ~720 amino acids) were recovered. In cases in which only partial OSC hits were identified, multiple small contigs were assembled to give full-length OSC ORFs. Contig assembly was performed using the ContigExpress tool in Vector NTI (version 11.5.3), and ORF or gene prediction was carried out using Fgenesh35. In this study, two different accessions of A. japonicus were used for OSC mining. Sequence resources for the accession ‘a’ were derived from Echinobase16 and Reich et al.33 (BioProject accession no. PRJNA236087). We recovered two OSCs from this accession and annotated them with the superscript ‘a’ throughout the study. The A. japonicus accession ‘b’ was derived from Li et al.14 (BioProject accession no. PRJNA413998). OSC hits from this accession were annotated with the superscript ‘b’. A predicted full-length LSS from Echinobase (S. purpuratus LSS)16 was also assembled from sea urchins. All contigs used in full-length OSC assembly and their associated details are listed in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. Further, predicted OSC amino acid sequences were scanned for the presence of the key active site motif DCTAE, which is implicated in protonation of 1 and initiation of the cyclization reaction36.
Phylogenetic analysis
OSC amino acid sequences were aligned using ClustalW (version 2.1) with default parameters as implemented in the program MEGA7 (version 10.2.6)37 and the CLC Genomics Workbench (version 9.5.3). Positions with gaps and missing data were eliminated. Evolutionary distances were computed using the JTT matrix-based method38. Phylogenetic analysis of OSC sequences was carried out using a neighbor-joining tree with 1,000 bootstrap replicates39.
Cloning
P. miniata LSS was cloned from cDNA of embryos (2 d old). P. parvimensis OSC1 and P. parvimensis OSC2 were cloned from mixed cDNA of P. parvimensis early developmental stages (embryos, 2 d old; larvae, 4 d old). These were amplified by PCR using primers with attB1 and attB2 adaptors and cloned into pDONOR207 (gentamicin resistance, Invitrogen) through a BP recombination reaction. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation (95 °C, 1 min), 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 4 min; final elongation step of 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR reaction mix contained 2 μl cDNA, 10 μM of each primer, 250 μM of each dNTP, 1× Phusion buffer and 1 U Phusion DNA polymerase (NEB). After the BP reaction and transformation, colony PCR was performed using GoTaq Green Master Mix (Promega), and positive clones were validated by sequencing. Positive clones were sequenced using three sets of primers covering the entire length of the gene (~2.2 kb). The bacterial OSC candidate was cloned from genomic DNA of the G. obscuriglobus DSM5831T strain (G. obscuriglobus OSC). Error-free clones were then cloned into pYES2 (ampicillin resistance) through yeast homologous recombination. All primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 9 (Sigma-Aldrich).
Gene assembly using yeast homologous recombination
The S. purpuratus LSS, A. japonicus OSC1a, A. japonicus OSC2a, A. japonicus OSC1b and A. japonicus OSC2b coding sequences were synthesized as gBlocks by Integrated DNA Technologies. The gBlocks were then recombined to give full-length genes by homologous recombination in yeast40. All yeast homologous recombination and expression analysis was carried out in the yeast strain Gil77 (gal2 hem3-6 erg7 ura3-167)18. The gBlocks were amplified by PCR using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 9. Each primer contains a region that overlaps with the pYES2 vector sequences, with the 5′ end of the forward primer overlapping with the GAL1 promoter and the 5′ end of the reverse primer overlapping with the CYC1 terminator, whereas the 3′ ends of the primers overlap with the beginning and end of the respective gBlocks. Amplified gBlocks were then cotransformed into Gil77 together with the pYES2 vector (ampicillin resistance, Invitrogen) linearized with XbaI and HindIII (Invitrogen). Yeast transformation was performed using a standard protocol (Yeastmaker Yeast Transformation System 2). Transformation resulted in in vivo recombination between the pYES2 vector and the gBlock OSC fragments, leading to generation of full-length expression constructs. Plasmids were recovered from the yeast and transformed back into Escherichia coli (DH5α), and their sequences were verified through sequencing. All primers used are listed in Supplementary Table 9.
Yeast expression
Yeast expression was carried out using the strain Gil77 (ref. 18). Yeast strains containing different expression constructs were grown in selective medium (SD-URA with 2% glucose and supplements) (5 ml) at 28 °C until saturation (~2 d). The supplements included 20 µg ml−1 ergosterol (Fluka), 13 µg ml−1 hemin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 5 mg ml−1 Tween-80 (Sigma-Aldrich). Next, cells were pelleted, washed with water (5 ml), transferred to induction medium (SD-URA with 2% galactose) and incubated for a further 2 d to allow OSC expression and accumulation of triterpenes. Yeast pellets were washed once with dH2O and stored at −80 °C until extraction.
Yeast lanosterol synthase complementation
Gil77 is an LSS-mutant strain and is unable to grow in the absence of exogenously supplied sterol (ergosterol)18. This phenotype can be rescued by complementation with an LSS OSC because OSC-derived lanosterol is converted to ergosterol by endogenous yeast enzymes. For complementation analysis, Gil77 OSC transformants were spotted onto the following media in tenfold serial dilutions: (1) SD-URA glucose plates supplemented with ergosterol, Tween-80 and hemin and (2) SD-URA with galactose and without ergosterol. The GAL1 promoter of the pYES2 construct drives gene expression in the presence of galactose and is repressed in the presence of glucose. Thus, any OSC that synthesizes lanosterol in vivo is expected to complement Gil77 growth in the absence of exogenous ergosterol and the presence of galactose.
Triterpene extraction
Frozen yeast pellets (~50 mg, fresh weight) were mixed with 0.5 ml saponification reagent (20% KOH in 50% ethanol, vol/vol) and incubated at 65 °C for 2 h before extraction with an equal volume of hexane (0.5 ml). The hexane extraction was repeated (2×) to maximize triterpene recovery. The combined extract was dried under nitrogen gas, and the residue was dissolved in 0.5 ml n-hexane. For rapid qualitative analysis, extracts were run on thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates (70644, Fluka) using a hexane:ethyl acetate (6:1, vol/vol) solvent system. Compounds were visualized by spraying the plates with acetic acid:H2SO4:p-anisaldehyde (48:1:1, vol/vol/vol) and heating them to 120 °C for 5 min on a TLC plate heater (CAMAG).
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis
For GC–MS analysis, 100-µl aliquots of n-hexane extracts from yeast experiments were transferred to 150-µl vial inserts and analyzed using an Agilent GC (7890B)–MSD (5977A) with a robotic multi-purpose auto-sampler. Samples were run on an HP-5MS column (inner diameter, 30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25-µm film, Phenomenex). The injector port, source and transfer line temperatures were set to 250 °C. An oven temperature program from 80 °C (2 min) to 290 °C (30 min) at 20 °C min−1 was used. The carrier gas was helium; the flow rate was 1.2 ml min−1. Samples (2 µl) were injected in splitless mode. For sterol quantification, the following gradient was used. Pulse pressure was set to 20 psi for 0.5 min after injection, and the inlet was purged after 0.5 min with a split vent flow at 100 ml min−1. Samples (2 µl) were injected in a pulsed split mode (5:1 split ratio). The injector port, source and transfer line temperatures were set to 250 °C. An oven temperature program from 150 °C (2 min) to 270 °C (6.5 min) at 20 °C min−1 was used, followed by 300 °C at 4 °C min−1 over 14 min, ramping up to 360 °C at 40 °C min−1 and then holding at 360 °C for 7 min. The carrier gas was helium, and the flow rate was 1.0 ml min−1. The output was used to search the NIST (version 8) library to assign identity to common peaks in the GC–MS traces. All experiments were repeated to confirm reproducibility of the triterpene profiles.
Inhibition of endogenous yeast ERG11
In LDS OSC experiments, ketoconazole was used to control undesired OSC product modifications by the endogenous yeast enzyme ERG11. Ketoconazole is a lanosterol 14α-demethylase (ERG11–CYP51) inhibitor. Ketoconazole (K1003, Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in DMSO and used in SD-URA medium with 2% galactose (50 µg ml−1 = ~100 µM).
Triterpene standards
Lanosterol was purchased commercially (L5768, Sigma-Aldrich), while lanostadienol and parkeol were purified in the present study (see below). These compounds were dissolved and diluted to 0.5 mg ml−1 in n-hexane and used as standards in GC–MS analysis.
Purification of parkeol and lanostadienol from yeast
Yeast strains expressing LDS or PS were grown (5 l) in minimal medium (SD-URA with 2% glucose and supplements) and induced (SD-URA with 2% galactose) for 2 d as described above. Cells were then pelleted by centrifuging at 4,000 r.p.m. for 15 min (SLC6000 rotor, Sorvall Evolution) and washed once with dH2O (500 ml) before extraction. Washed cell pellets (~50–60 g fresh weight) were resuspended in 500 ml saponification reagent (20% KOH in 50% ethanol, vol/vol) and incubated in a water bath (65 °C for 2 h) before extraction with an equal volume of hexane. Hexane extraction was repeated (3×) to maximize triterpene recovery. The extract was then dried in vacuo using a rotary evaporator. The organic residue (~200–300 mg) was dry loaded onto pre-made silica columns (Biotage SNAP Ultra 10g, 21 × 55 mm, 25 µm) that had been equilibrated with hexane. Separation was carried out using an advanced automated flash chromatographic purification system, Isolera One (Biotage). Chromatographic runs were carried out using a gradient of ethyl acetate (solvent B) in hexane (solvent A). Gradient elution was initiated with hexane for ten column volumes and changed to ethyl acetate in hexane (2–30%, vol/vol) over 25 column volumes, and fractions (5 ml) were collected throughout the run. Fractions were assessed for triterpene content using TLC (silica gel 60 F254 plates, Merck). The fractions containing the relevant triterpenes were pooled, and purity was assessed by GC–MS (as described above). Based on the purity, purification was repeated to ensure clear separation of closely resolving compounds. Fractions containing pure parkeol and lanostadienol were combined, dried using a rotary evaporator (BUCHI) and subjected to NMR.
Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis
One-dimensional and two-dimensional NMR spectra (1H, 13C, DEPT135, COSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY) were acquired on a Bruker 400-MHz TopSpin NMR spectrometer. All signals were acquired at 298 K. Samples were dissolved in deuterated chloroform (CDCl3) for data acquisition, and calibration was performed by referencing to either residual solvent 1H and 13C signals or tetramethylsilane. Compound identities were confirmed by comparing their 1H and/or 13C NMR data with those reported previously in the literature41,42.
Large-scale saponin extraction and purification from processed sea cucumbers
Processed P. parvimensis sea cucumbers (~1.75 kg, dry weight) (WK Distribution) were soaked in distilled water for 2 d to allow swelling and softening. Soft and swollen sea cucumbers were pulverized and soaked in 100% ethanol (vol/vol) for 2 weeks. The ethanol extract was filtered (Whatman no. 1 filter paper) and dried in vacuo using a Rotavapor R-300 (BUCHI) at 30 °C. The remaining aqueous layer was extracted with n-hexane. The n-hexane extract was used in the purification of sterols as described below. After n-hexane extraction, the aqueous extract was partitioned with n-butanol (1:5 ratio, vol/vol) and centrifuged (4,000 r.p.m., SLC6000 rotor, Sorvall Evolution) to enable phase separation. n-butanol partitioning was repeated (3×) to ensure efficient recovery of saponins. The combined n-butanol extracts were dried under vacuum at 56 °C using a Rotavapor R-300 (BUCHI). The resulting extract (greasy yellowish) was freeze-dried to remove any residual n-butanol. The freeze-dried extract (~3 g) was dry loaded onto a normal-phase silica column (Biotage SNAP Ultra 100g, 39 × 157 mm, 25 µm) and separated using an advanced automated flash chromatographic purification system (Isolera One). Separation was carried out with a gradient of dichloromethane (DCM, solvent A) and methanol (7.5% water in methanol, solvent B). The run was initiated with DCM, changed to 15% methanol (vol/vol) in DCM (vol/vol) over 50 column volumes and then changed to 30% methanol (vol/vol) in DCM (vol/vol). During this process, 22-ml fractions were collected, dried and analyzed for saponins by TLC (Silica gel 60G glass plates, 20 × 20 cm, Merck) using avenacin A-1 from oats43 as a tracking standard. Saponins were visualized by spraying the plates with acetic acid:H2SO4:p-anisaldehyde (48:1:1, vol/vol/vol) and heating them to 120 °C for 5 min on a TLC plate heater (CAMAG).
Yeast growth-inhibition assays
Yeast growth-inhibition assays were carried out using the yeast strain Y21900 (BY4743; MATa/MATα;ura3Δ0/ura3Δ0;leu2Δ0/leu2Δ0;his3Δ1/his3Δ1;met15Δ0/MET15;LYS2/lys2Δ0;YHR072w/YHR072w::kanMX4, Euroscarf). Y21900 was grown in YPD medium. A stock solution of crude extracts and saponin standards (1 mg ml−1) were prepared in methanol, and lower concentrations were prepared by serial dilution. All yeast growth-inhibition assays were carried out in 96-well plates (skirted, round bottom, Sterilin 96). Adult tissues and samples from early growth stages of P. parvimensis (n = 2) and A. japonicus (n = 3) were used in the analysis. Two technical replicates were also included to account for low-volume pipetting errors, etc. Sea cucumber early developmental-stage samples consisted of several hundred embryos or larvae per sample. Assays were carried out in 100 µl YPD medium seeded with 1 µl yeast culture (100-fold dilution of an overnight culture). Saponins (1–100 µg ml−1, 1–5 µl) and crude extracts (25–100 µg ml−1, 1–5 µl) were added at the beginning of the culture period, and plates were incubated in a shaking incubator (30 °C overnight, 100 r.p.m.). Growth was recorded by measuring OD600 using a FLUOstar Omega multidetector microplate reader (BMG LABTECH) with default settings. Sample OD values were corrected against OD values of wells containing YPD medium alone (called ‘blank corrected’).
Saponin analysis and characterization using the Q Exactive Plus Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap mass spectrometer
UHPLC–MS analysis of saponins was carried out on a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific). Chromatography was performed using a Kinetex 2.6-μm XB-C18 100-Å, 50-mm × 2.1-mm (Phenomenex) column kept at 30 °C. Water containing 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid were used as mobile phases A and B, respectively, with a flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1 and an injection volume of 10 µl. A gradient elution program was applied as follows: 0–5 min, linear increase of 0–30% B; 5–28 min, linear increase of 30–50% B; 28–33 min, linear increase of 50–100% B; 33–34 min, linear drop from 100% to 20% B; 1-min hold for re-equilibration, giving a total run time of 35 min. A full scan in combination with data-dependent MS2 scans (full MS/dd-MS2, top three) was applied. MS detection was performed in a negative ionization ESI range of 100–2,000 m/z and at a mass resolution of 70,000. Targeted selected ion monitoring and parallel reaction monitoring acquisition were performed with mass resolution set at 35,000 FWHM and a mass isolation window of 1.6 m/z and an AGC of 3 × 106. In parallel reaction monitoring mode, data were acquired according to a predetermined inclusion list containing the accurate masses of known saponins. Data were acquired and processed using Thermo Scientific Xcalibur software (version 4.3.73.11). Saponin mass fragmentation spectra were compared with previously reported saponins from P. parvimensis20 and A. japonicus21.
Small-scale saponin extraction from adult tissues and early-stage samples
To establish whether saponin accumulation is tissue specific, at a small scale, saponin activity and saponin content were analyzed by yeast growth-inhibition assays and LC–MS over a range of sea cucumber tissues and early growth stages. Seven adult tissues were collected from two different species of sea cucumbers, P. parvimensis (n = 2) and A. japonicus (n = 3). Tissue samples were collected in 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes, freeze-dried and homogenized using a GenoGrinder (1,500 r.p.m., 1 min). Homogenized tissues of a known weight (~2–3 mg, dry weight) were extracted twice with methanol (200 μl) in a sonication bath (EMAG ultrasonic cleaner Emmi 12 HC, 45 min). Combined extracts were centrifuged (14,680g, 5 min), and supernatants were transferred to preweighed 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes. Extracts were dried in vacuo using a ROTAVAC (EZ-2 Series Evaporator, Genevac) at 30 °C for 45 min. Samples were then freeze-dried to remove any residual methanol. Stock solutions (1 mg ml−1 and 100 μg ml−1, wt/vol) were prepared and serially diluted in methanol.
Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of extracts from adult tissues and early-stage samples
An LC method was designed with a flow rate of 0.3 ml min−1 (2.6-μm XB-C18 100-Å, 50 mm × 2.1 mm) (Phenomenex). The solvents used were solvent A (water with 0.1% formic acid) and solvent B (acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid). Sea cucumber adult tissues and early-stage extracts (100 μg ml−1) were analyzed using LC–MS–CAD (instrument, Prominence HPLC system, single quadrupole mass spectrometer, LCMS-2020, Shimadzu) both in positive and negative ion modes. The gradient was as follows: 30% B, 0–5 min; 20–50% B from 5 to 28 min; 50–100% B from 28 to 30 min; 100% B from 30 to 33 min; 100–20% B from 33 to 34 min; 20% B from 34 to 35 min; injection volume, 10 µl. LC–MS LabSolutions (version 3) (Shimadzu) was used to analyze chromatograms.
Purification and characterization of unusual sterols from sea cucumbers
The crude n-hexane extract recovered from phase separation during large-scale saponin extraction was dried in vacuo in a rotovapor (BUCHI). Around 2 g of the greasy yellowish crude extract was dry loaded onto a normal-phase silica column (Biotage SNAP Ultra 100g, 39 × 157 mm, 25 µm) that had been pre-equilibrated with n-hexane. Separation was carried out using Isolera One (Biotage). Chromatographic separation was carried with a gradient of 0–3% ethyl acetate (solvent B) in n-hexane (solvent A) over 60 column volumes, followed by a gradient of 3–20% solvent B over ten column volumes. Fractions (22 ml) were collected and evaluated by TLC as described earlier. Fractions with sterols of interest were pooled, and purity was assessed by GC–MS analysis as described earlier. Purified compounds were subjected to NMR in CDCl3 (Sigma-Aldrich). Compound identities were confirmed by comparing their 1H or 13C NMR data with those reported previously44–50.
Analysis of sterols from sea urchins, sea stars and sea cucumbers
Sterols were extracted from different adult tissues of sea cucumbers, sea urchins and sea stars (2 mg, dry weight). Dried tissues were extracted in ethyl acetate (100 µl) with 10 µg ml−1 internal standard (hexatriacontane-d74, Sigma-Aldrich) in a sonicated water bath (EMAG ultrasonic cleaner Emmi 12 HC, 30 min). Extracts were centrifuged (2,000 r.p.m., 2 min), and the supernatants were dried under nitrogen gas for 15 min. The dried residues were derivatized using a 1-(trimethylsilyl)imidazole–pyridine mixture (92718, Sigma-Aldrich) at 75 °C for 30 min. Next, samples were transferred to 150-µl vial inserts and analyzed by GC–MS using a 14-min gradient as described in earlier sections. The standards cholesterol (Sigma-Aldrich), lathosterol (Sigma-Aldrich) and 11 (this study) were also derivatized in a similar manner with 10 µg ml−1 internal standard and used in the study.
Sterol quantification
A series of different concentrations of cholesterol, lathosterol and 11 were prepared in n-hexane from a 1 mg ml−1 stock. Ion m/z 66 was used as a quantifier for the internal standard. Ions m/z 129, 459 and 457 were used as quantifiers for cholesterol, lathosterol and 11 sterols, respectively. Calibration curves of all sterol standards had a regression coefficient of R2 > 0.99. Qualifiers were automatically selected by MS Quantitative Analysis software (Agilent). Automated data generated by MS Quantitative Analysis software were confirmed by manual inspection of peak mass spectra and retention times. Calibration curves and quantification was performed using MS Quantitative Analysis software as implemented in MassHunter Chemstation (version B.07.00) (Agilent).
A. japonicus LDS and A. japonicus PS RNA-seq expression analysis
A. japonicus adult organs (intestine, tentacle, muscle, body wall, male gonads, female gonads and tube feet), embryonic-stage samples (zygote, cleavages, blastulae and gastrulae), larvae (auricularia, doliolaria and pentactula) and juvenile samples were used for RNA-seq library construction. Total mRNA for each tissue type was extracted following the protocol described earlier51. RNA-seq libraries were constructed using the NEBNext mRNA Library Prep kit (NEB), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The prepared libraries were subjected to paired-end 100-bp sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Sequencing reads were first filtered by removing those containing undetermined bases (‘N’) or excessive numbers of low-quality positions and then aligned to the A. japonicus genome using STAR aligner with its default parameters52. Raw counts of aligned reads per gene were obtained using HTSeq (version 0.6.1)53. Gene expression levels were represented in the form of RPKM.
Quantitative reverse transcription analysis of LDS and PS transcripts
For OSC expression (P. parvimensis LDS and P. parvimensis PS) analysis, total RNA was extracted from different adult tissues and early developmental-stage samples of P. parvimensis using TRI Reagent (T9424, Sigma-Aldrich). RNA samples were treated with DNase I (Roche). First-strand cDNA synthesis was carried out using the SuperScript II Reverse Transcriptase kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Primers used for quantitative reverse transcription analysis are listed in Supplementary Table 9.
Whole-mount mRNA in situ analysis
Synthesis of P. parvimensis LDS and P. parvimensis PS probes
RNA was isolated from 2-dpf and 4-dpf larvae of P. parvimensis using the Total Mammalian RNA Miniprep kit (Sigma-Aldrich) and converted to first-strand cDNA with the iScript Select cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad). Primers were designed against the P. parvimensis sea cucumber OSC genes LDS and PS such that the PCR products were 500–1,000 nucleotides long and the reverse primers had T7 or SP6 tails. The cDNA from the desired stages were used as a template for PCR. Antisense digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA probes were synthesized from PCR products specific to P. parvimensis LDS or P. parvimensis PS using the DIG RNA Labeling kit (Roche). The primers used are described in Supplementary Table 9.
Whole-mount in situ hybridization
Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed as described earlier with the following modifications54. Pre-hybridization, hybridization and post-hybridization washes were performed at 58 °C. Optimal probe concentrations were determined experimentally (~0.2 ng μl−1). After blocking, embryos were incubated overnight at 4 °C in 2% blocking reagent (Roche) in malic acid buffer with the addition of a 1:2,000 dilution of anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibody (Roche). Embryos were mounted in antifade reagent in glycerol–PBS from the SlowFade Antifade kit (Invitrogen) and imaged using a Leica DFC420 C camera on a Leica DMI4000 B microscope.
Homology modeling
Using human LSS as a template (Protein Data Bank 1W6K)28, homology models of P. miniata LSS, S. purpuratus LSS, P. parvimensis LDS and P. parvimensis PS were developed to identify variations in the active site that govern product specificities of these OSCs. Homology models were generated using the Phyre2 (version 2.0)55 and I-TASSER (version 5.0)56 servers with default parameters. The models obtained were subjected to stereochemical validation using tools embedded in Chimera (version 1.15)57 and visualized using Chimera as well as PyMOL (version 2.0). Protein sequences were aligned using ClustalW (version 2.1), and active site residues were manually annotated using functional information available for human LSS28.
Site-directed mutagenesis
Site-directed mutagenesis was carried out to establish whether residue position 444 (F, Q or L) determines product specificity in sea cucumber OSCs. The primer-design strategy and PCR conditions used were as described earlier58. Transfer-PCR (TPCR) was used in site-directed mutagenesis reactions59. Briefly, TPCR conditions include initial denaturation (95 °C, 1 min); 13 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min; and then 20 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 67 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 4 min. Reactions were completed with a final elongation step of 7 min at 72 °C. PCR components included 5–10 ng pDONOR or pYES2 plasmid DNA, 20 nM mutagenic primers, 250 μM of each dNTP, 1× Phusion buffer and 1 U Phusion DNA polymerase (NEB). At the end of the TPCR reaction, 1 μl DpnI was added to a 10-μl reaction and incubated at 37 °C for 1–2 h. An aliquot (5 μl) of reaction mixture was transformed into E. coli (DH5α, Invitrogen), and positive transformants were verified through sequencing. Primers used for mutagenesis are listed in Supplementary Table 9.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41589-022-01054-y.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank P.J. Bryant (University of California, Irvine) for permission to use the sea cucumber image shown in Fig. 1a, H.-W. Nützmann (John Innes Centre; now at the University of Bath) for assistance with P. parvimensis quantitative reverse transcription analysis, Z. Xue (Northeast Forestry University) for providing samples of dried A. japonicus, D.P. Devos (CABD) for providing G. obscuriglobus genomic DNA, G.M. Wessel (Brown University) for P. miniata RNA samples and L. Hill and P. Brett (John Innes Centre Metabolite Services) for advice on metabolite analysis. We also thank M.J. Stephenson (John Innes Centre) for critical reading of the draft manuscript. A.O. and R.T. acknowledge funding support provided by European Union grant KBBE-2013-7 (TriForC), the Biotechnological and Biological Sciences Research Council Institute Strategic Programme grant ‘Molecules from Nature Products and Pathways’ (BBS/E/J/000PR9790) and the John Innes Foundation. R.T. also acknowledges funding support from a DBT-Ramalingaswami fellowship from India. S.W. acknowledges the support of the Marine S&T Fund of Shandong Province for Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao) (No. 2022QNLM050101-1), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32130107) and the Taishan Scholar Project Fund of Shandong Province of China. Z.B. acknowledges the support of the Key R&D Project of Shandong Province (2020ZLYS10), the Sanya Yazhouwan Science and Technology City Management Foundation (SKJC-KJ-2019KY01) and the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA.
Extended data
Source data
Author contributions
R.T. carried out bioinformatics, gene cloning, vector construction, analysis of wild-type and mutant variants of OSCs and saponin and sterol extraction, quantification, analysis and purification; A.C.H. performed NMR analysis and structural assignments; R.C.M. carried out mutational analysis of S. purpuratus LSS in yeast and part of the saponin analysis using LC–MS2; G.S. carried out the initial MALDI-TOF analysis; M.Z. and V.H. provided sea cucumber, sea star and sea urchin tissues and cDNA and carried out mRNA in situ analysis of sea cucumber OSC genes; S.W., Z.B., Y.C. and Z.Z. provided sea cucumber LAS sequences, access to previously published transcriptome data and samples of sea cucumber tissues for saponin and sterol analysis. All authors contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. R.T. and A.O. conceived the project and wrote the paper.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Chemical Biology thanks Philipp Zerbe and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
Data supporting the findings of this work are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The datasets, constructs and chemical standards generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Sea cucumber material is available from co-authors V.H. (Carnegie Mellon University, email veronica@cmu.edu) and S.W. (Ocean University of China, email swang@ouc.edu.cn). The sequences of genes characterized in this project will be deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive, and accession numbers will be shared before publication. Source data are provided with this paper. Sea urchin, sea star and sea cucumber OSC sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the following ids ON478348-ON478355.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Shi Wang, Minyan Zheng.
Contributor Information
Ramesha Thimmappa, Email: btramesha@gmail.com.
Anne Osbourn, Email: anne.osbourn@jic.ac.uk.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41589-022-01054-y.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41589-022-01054-y.
References
- 1.Flajnik MF, Du Pasquier L. Evolution of innate and adaptive immunity: can we draw a line? Trends Immunol. 2004;25:640–644. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shimada S. Antifungal steroid glycoside from sea cucumber. Science. 1969;163:1462. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3874.1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Minale L, Pizza C, Riccio R, Zollo F. Steroidal glycosides from starfishes. Pure Appl. Chem. 1982;54:1935–1950. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yasumoto T, Tanaka M, Hashimoto Y. Distribution of saponin in echinoderms. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1966;32:673–676. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dyck SV, et al. The triterpene glycosides of Holothuria forskali: usefulness and efficiency as a chemical defense mechanism against predatory fish. J. Exp. Biol. 2011;214:1347–1356. doi: 10.1242/jeb.050930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kalinin, V. I. et al. Biological activities and biological role of triterpene glycosides from holothuroids (Echinodermata). In Echinoderm Studies (eds Jangoux, M. & Lawrence, J. M.) 5A.A. 139–181 (Balkema, 1996).
- 7.Hamel J, Mercier A. Evidence of chemical communication during the gametogenesis of holothuroids. Ecology. 1996;77:1600–1616. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Naruse M, et al. Acrosome reaction-related steroidal saponin, Co-ARIS, from the starfish induces structural changes in microdomains. Dev. Biol. 2010;347:147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Caulier G, Flammang P, Gerbaux P, Eeckhaut PI. When a repellent becomes an attractant: harmful saponins are kairomones attracting the symbiotic Harlequin crab. Sci. Rep. 2013;3:2639. doi: 10.1038/srep02639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Flórez LV, Biedermann PH, Engl T, Kaltenpoth M. Defensive symbioses of animals with prokaryotic and eukaryotic microorganisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015;32:904–936. doi: 10.1039/c5np00010f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Claereboudt EJS, Eeckhaut I, Lins L, Deleu M. How different sterols contribute to saponin tolerant plasma membranes in sea cucumbers. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:10845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29223-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bordbar S, Anwar F, Saari N. High-value components and bioactives from sea cucumbers for functional foods—a review. Mar. Drugs. 2011;9:1761–1805. doi: 10.3390/md9101761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Thimmappa R, Geisler K, Louveau T, O’Maille P, Osbourn A. Triterpene biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2014;65:225–257. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li, Y. et al. Sea cucumber genome provides insights into saponin biosynthesis and aestivation regulation. Cell Discov. 4, 29 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Hall MR, et al. The crown-of-thorns starfish genome as a guide for biocontrol of this coral reef pest. Nature. 2017;544:231–234. doi: 10.1038/nature22033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kudtarkar P, Cameron RA. Echinobase: an expanding resource for echinoderm genomic information. Database. 2017;2017:bax074. doi: 10.1093/database/bax074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang X, et al. The sea cucumber genome provides insights into morphological evolution and visceral regeneration. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2003790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kushiro T, Shibuya M, Ebizuka Y. β-amyrin synthase—cloning of oxidosqualene cyclase that catalyzes the formation of the most popular triterpene among higher plants. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998;256:238–244. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1998.2560238.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ito R, et al. Triterpene cyclases from Oryza sativa L.: cycloartenol, parkeol and achilleol B synthases. Org. Lett. 2011;13:2678–2681. doi: 10.1021/ol200777d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.de Moncerrat Iniguez-Martinez AM, Guerra-Rivas G, Rios L, Quijano T. Triterpenoid oligoglycosides from the sea cucumber Stichopus parvimensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2005;68:1669–1673. doi: 10.1021/np050196m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang Z, et al. Antifungal nortriterpene and triterpene glycosides from the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus Selenka. Food Chem. 2012;132:295–300. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pivkin MV. Filamentous fungi associated with holothurians from the sea of Japan, off the primorye coast of Russia. Biol. Bull. 2000;198:101–109. doi: 10.2307/1542808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Iyengar EV, Harvell CD. Predator deterrence of early developmental stages of temperate lecithotrophic asteroids and holothuroids. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2001;264:171–188. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Anisimov MM, Fronert EB, Kuznetsova TA, Elyakov GB. The toxic effects of triterpene glycosides from Stichopus japonicus on early embryogenesis of the sea urchin. Toxicon. 1973;11:109–111. doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(73)90163-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Fusetani N, Kato Y, Hashimoto K. Biological effects of asterosaponins with special reference to structure–activity relationships. J. Nat. Prod. 1984;47:997–1002. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Stonik VA, et al. Free sterol compositions from the sea cucumbers Pseudostichopus trachus, Holothuria nobilis, Holothuria scabra, Trochostoma orientale and Bathyplotes natans. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1998;120B:337–347. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wollam J, et al. The Rieske oxygenase DAF-36 functions as a cholesterol 7-desaturase in steroidogenic pathways governing longevity. Aging Cell. 2011;10:879–884. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00733.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Thoma R, et al. Insight into steroid scaffold formation from the structure of human oxidosqualene cyclase. Nature. 2004;432:118–122. doi: 10.1038/nature02993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D506–D515. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lepesheva GI, Waterman MR. Sterol 14α-demethylase cytochrome P450 (CYP51), a P450 in all biological kingdoms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2007;1770:467–477. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2006.07.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.McCauley BS, Wright EP, Exner C, Kitazawa C, Hinman VF. Development of an embryonic skeletogenic mesenchyme lineage in a sea cucumber reveals the trajectory of change for the evolution of novel structures in echinoderms. EvoDevo. 2012;3:17. doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-3-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang, Q. L. & Liu, Y. H. Cultivation Techniques on Sea Cucumber and Sea Urchin (Ocean University of China, 1998).
- 33.Reich A, Dunn C, Akasaka K, Wessel G. Phylogenomic analyses of Echinodermata support the sister groups of Asterozoa and Echinozoa. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0119627. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Janies, D. A. et al. EchinoDB, an application for comparative transcriptomics of deeply sampled clades of echinoderms. BMC Bioinformatics17, 48 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Solovyev, V., Kosarev, P., Seledsov, I. & Vorobyev, D. Automatic annotation of eukaryotic genes, pseudogenes and promoters. Genome Biol. 7, S10 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Racolta S, Juhl PB, Sirim J, Pleiss D. The triterpene cyclase protein family: a systematic analysis. Proteins. 2012;80:2009–2019. doi: 10.1002/prot.24089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016;33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1992;8:275–282. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 1985;39:783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mizutani K. High-throughput plasmid construction using homologous recombination in yeast: its mechanisms and application to protein production for X-ray crystallography. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2015;79:1–10. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2014.952614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Takase S, et al. Control of the 1,2-rearrangement process by oxidosqualene cyclases during triterpene biosynthesis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015;13:7331–7336. doi: 10.1039/c5ob00714c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Herrera JBR, Wilson WK, Matsuda SPT. Tyrosine-to-threonine mutation converts cycloartenol synthase to an oxidosqualene cyclase that forms lanosterol as its major product. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000;122:6765–6766. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Turner EM. The nature of resistance of oats to the take-all fungus. III. Distribution of the inhibitor in oat seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 1960;11:403–412. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kalinovskaya NI, Kuznetsova TA, Elyakov GB. Sterol composition of Pacific holothurian Stichopus japonicus Selenka. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. 1983;74:597–601. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Itoh T, Ishii T, Tamura T, Matsumoto T. Four new and other 4α-methylsterols in the seeds of Solanaceae. Phytochemistry. 1978;17:971–977. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Makarieva TN, et al. Biosynthetic studies of marine lipids. 42. Biosynthesis of steroid and triterpenoid metabolites in the sea cucumber Eupentacta fraudatrix. Steroids. 1993;58:508–517. doi: 10.1016/0039-128x(93)90026-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Goad LJ, Garneau FX, Simard JL, ApSimon JW, Girard M. Isolation of Δ9(11) sterols from the sea cucumber Psolus fabricii. Implication for holothurin biosynthesis. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985;26:3513–3517. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Goad LJ, Garneau FX, Simard JL, ApSimon JW, Girard M. Composition of the free, esterified and sulphated sterols of the sea cucumber Psolus fabricii. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. 1986;84:189–196. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cordeiro ML, Kerr RG, Djerassi C. Conversion of parkeol (lanosta-9(11),24-dien-3β-ol) to 14α-methylcholest-9(11)-en-3β-ol in the sea cucumber. Holothuria arenicola. Tetrahedron Lett. 1988;29:2159–2162. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Cordeiro ML, Djerassi C. Biosynthetic studies of marine lipids. 25. Biosynthesis of Δ9(11)- and Δ7(8)-sterols and saponins in sea cucumbers. J. Org. Chem. 1990;55:2806–2813. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Du H, et al. Transcriptome sequencing and characterization for the sea cucumber Apostichopus japonicus (Selenka, 1867) PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e33311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dobin A, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:15–21. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Hinman VF, Nguyen AT, Davidson EH. Expression and function of a starfish Otx ortholog, AmOtx: a conserved role for Otx proteins in endoderm development that predates divergence of the eleutherozoa. Mech. Dev. 2003;120:1165–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.mod.2003.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kelley LA, et al. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10:845–858. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:40. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Salmon M, et al. A conserved amino acid residue critical for product and substrate specificity in plant triterpene synthases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:E4407–E4414. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605509113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Erijman A, Dantes A, Bernheim R, Shifman JM, Peleg Y. Transfer-PCR (TPCR): a highway for DNA cloning and protein engineering. J. Struct. Biol. 2011;175:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Miteva MA, Guyon F, Tufféry P. Frog2: efficient 3D conformation ensemble generator for small compounds. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W622–W627. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data supporting the findings of this work are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. The datasets, constructs and chemical standards generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon request. Sea cucumber material is available from co-authors V.H. (Carnegie Mellon University, email veronica@cmu.edu) and S.W. (Ocean University of China, email swang@ouc.edu.cn). The sequences of genes characterized in this project will be deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive, and accession numbers will be shared before publication. Source data are provided with this paper. Sea urchin, sea star and sea cucumber OSC sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the following ids ON478348-ON478355.