Table 3.
Models | serum Klotho concentrations | |
---|---|---|
β(95%CI) | P-value | |
Model I | ||
One line slope | -4.63 (-7.61, -1.65) | 0.002 |
Model II | ||
Turning point (K) | -1.82 (-2.32, -0.80) | |
<—1.82 slope 1 | -33.05 (-52.84, -13.27) | 0.001 |
>—1.82 slope 2 | -2.19 (-5.61, 1.24) | 0.211 |
Slope 2 – Slope 1 | 30.87 (9.63, 52.11) | 0.004 |
Predicted at 2.82 | 846.43 (834.62, 858.24) | |
Log likelihood ratio test | 0.004b |
Model I, linear analysis
Model II, non-linear analysis
Log likelihood ratio test: P-value < 0.05 means Model II is significantly different from Model I, which indicates a non-linear relationship
aadjusted for age; sex; Race; Ratio of family income to poverty; BMI; alcohol intake; physical activity; smoking; eGFR
bindicates that Model II is significantly different from Model I