Table 3.
Evaluation results
|
Possible responses in % (N = 20) 1 = Completely agree, 6 = Completely disagree after day 1/ after day 2 |
Mean (standard deviation) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| I consider the addressed topics to be important. a | 80.0/70.0 | 20.0/15.0 | 0.0/5.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 1.2(0.4)/1.5 (0.8) |
| The content of the seminar was well structured. a | 95.0/65.0 | 5.0/30.0 | 0.0/5.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 1.1(0.2)/1.4(0.6) |
| The content was presented in a comprehensible manner. a | 100.0/85.0 | 0.0/15.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 1.0(0.0)/1.2(0.4) |
| The amount of material was appropriate. a | 80.0/80.0 | 15.0/15.0 | 5.0/5.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 1.3(0.6)/1.3(0.6) |
| I could participate actively. a | 100.0/85.0 | 0.0/10.0 | 0.0/5.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 1.0(0.0)/1.2(0.5) |
| I learned something from the seminar. a | 45.0/70.0 | 50.0/25.0 | 5.0/5.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 1.6(0.6)/1.4(0.6) |
| The employed teaching methods (digital whiteboard, breakout-sessions) helped convey the content. a | 70.0/80.0 | 30.0/15.0 | 0.0/5.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 0.0/0.0 | 1.3(0.5)/1.3(0.6) |
| Role-play… | |||||||
| …enabled learning content to be conveyed well | 70.0 | 20.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5(1.0) |
| … enabled the topic to be dealt with comprehensibly and with practical relevance | 70.0 | 20.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.5(1.0) |
| I would recommend the seminar to other students | 100.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0(0.0) |
| This elective should continue to be provided in an online format after Corona | 55.0 | 5.0 | 30.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0(1.3) |
| Overall assessment of the seminar | 95.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1(0.2) |
a after day 1/ after day 2