Table 3.
Odds of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Underdiagnosis or Undertreatment Among Childhood Cancer Survivors, Adjusted for Sex, Race/Ethnicity, and Current Age
Characteristic |
Underdiagnosis N=155* |
Undertreatment N=120* |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
Male vs female (ref) | 1.8 (1.2–2.6) | 0.003 | 1.9 (1.2–2.9) | 0.004 |
Other races and ethnicities vs non‐Hispanic White (ref) | 0.7 (0.4–1.3) | 0.30 | 0.9 (0.5–1.7) | 0.72 |
Current age, y | ||||
20–34 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
35–39 | 1.0 (0.6–1.6) | 0.94 | 2.3 (1.2–4.2) | 0.009 |
≥40 | 0.9 (0.6–1.5) | 0.78 | 2.9 (1.7–4.9) | <0.001 |
Anthracycline exposure vs none (ref) | 1.5 (0.9–2.5) | 0.12 | 0.7 (0.5–1.2) | 0.22 |
Chest radiotherapy exposure vs none (ref) | 1.0 (0.7–1.5) | 0.88 | 2.0 (1.3–3.1) | 0.002 |
Survivorship clinic attendance vs none (ref) | 0.8 (0.5–1.2) | 0.23 | 0.9 (0.6–1.4) | 0.65 |
No routine vs routine checkup (ref) | 1.3 (0.6–2.5) | 0.50 | 0.6 (0.2–1.7) | 0.37 |
No. adverse lifestyle factors † | ||||
0 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
1 | 1.1 (0.6–1.9) | 0.72 | 1.4 (0.7–2.6) | 0.34 |
≥2 | 1.8 (1.0–3.3) | 0.06 | 2.2 (1.1–4.5) | 0.03 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | ||||
<25 | 1.0 (ref) | 1.0 (ref) | ||
25–29 | 2.3 (1.5–3.6) ‡ | <0.001 | 1.7 (1.0–2.9) | 0.07 |
≥30 | 2.9 (1.7–4.9) | <0.001 | ||
High vs low health‐related self‐efficacy (ref) § | 0.7 (0.5–1.1) | 0.13 | 0.5 (0.3–0.8) | 0.003 |
MHLC scale ║ | ||||
Internal | 0.9 (0.7–1.2) | 0.49 | 0.7 (0.5–0.9) | 0.01 |
Chance | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 0.70 | 1.1 (0.8–1.4) | 0.53 |
Powerful others | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 0.95 | 1.5 (1.1–1.9) | 0.009 |
MHLC indicates Multidimensional Health Locus of Control; OR, odds ratio; and ref, referent.
Compared with survivors without any cardiovascular disease risk factor underdiagnosis and undertreatment (n=323; referent).
Consisting of physical inactivity, low fruit/vegetable consumption, and current smoking/tobacco use.
25–29 and ≥30 kg/m2 categories combined as univariate analyses showed ORs 2.4 for both categories when compared with <25 kg/m2.
Defined as T‐score ≥50 vs <50 (ref).
Modeled as a linear term with risk estimates reflecting the association with a 1‐unit increase in the scale value.