Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 6;13(3):e01074-22. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01074-22

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Temporal regulation of mutagenesis by stress responses in E. coli mutagenic break repair. (Step 1) DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are generated by various processes and can then be repaired by homologous or microhomologous repair mechanisms. (Top) During homology-directed DSB repair (HR) (reviewed in references 74 and 75), ssDNA exposed at the DSB ends base pairs with complementary sequence in a sister chromosome, promoting repair DNA synthesis. (Step 2) DSBs also induce the SOS response, which transcriptionally upregulates the error-prone DNA polymerases (Pols) IV, V, and II (82); however, repair remains accurate unless another stressor induces the general stress (σS) response (44, 45). (Step 3) The σS response induces two kinds of switches to mutagenic DSB repair. In cells that are also SOS induced, the σS response, by unknown means, allows the use of, or persistence of errors made by, the error-prone DNA Pols in repair, causing base substitutions (45, 84) and indels (43, 44, 83, 166, 167). σS also downregulates mismatch repair (3740, 88), which allows errors in DNA synthesis to persist. (Bottom) Less frequently, microhomologous MBR of a DSB occurs. It is SOS independent and requires (step 2) the σS response and DNA Pol I for template switching to regions containing microhomology (49, 50) (few complementary bases). The repair replication creates genome rearrangements. A duplicated chromosome segment is shown (blue arrows). Parallel lines represent base-paired DNA strands, and half arrowheads represent the 3′ DNA ends.