Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;2022(6):CD004622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004622.pub4

1. Full‐mouth scaling versus control: change in probing pocket depth.

Tooth type:
single‐ or multi‐rooted,
or both Baseline pocket depth (mm) Time
(months) Number of studies (participants) Mean difference (95% CI)
(random‐effects meta‐analysis) Heterogeneity
Both 5–6 3/4 6 (177) –0.05 (–0.19, 0.09); P = 0.47 P = 0.97; I² = 0%
Both > 6 3/4 7 (193) –0.04 (–0.29, 0.21); P = 0.77 P = 0.66; I² = 0%
Both 5–6 6/8 3 (88) –0.14 (–0.45, 0.18); P = 0.39 P = 0.85; I² = 0%
Both > 6 6/8 4 (104) –0.16 (–0.60, 0.28); P = 0.48 P = 0.41; I² = 0%
Single‐rooted 5–6 3/4 1 (16) 0.63 (0.29, 0.97); P = 0.0002 Not applicable
Single‐rooted > 6 3/4 0 (0) Not estimable Not applicable
Single‐rooted 5–6 6/8 3 (69) 0.16 (–0.01, 0.32); P = 0.06 P = 0.89; I² = 0%
Single‐rooted > 6 6/8 2 (53) 0.26 (–0.21, 0.73); P = 0.27 P = 0.64; I² = 0%
Multi‐rooted 5–6 3/4 1 (16) 1.00 (0.41, 1.59); P = 0.0008 Not applicable
Multi‐rooted > 6 3/4 0 (0) Not estimable Not applicable
Multi‐rooted 5–6 6/8 3 (69) 0.21 (–0.14, 0.55); P = 0.24 P = 0.06; I² = 64%
Multi‐rooted > 6 6/8 2 (53) 0.18 (–0.26, 0.62); P = 0.42 P = 0.42; I² = 0%

CI: confidence interval.