Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 26;2015(10):CD007698. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007698.pub3

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Budesonide MMX® 9 mg versus placebo for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.

Budesonide MMX® 9 mg versus placebo for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis
Patient or population: Adult patients with active ulcerative colitis
 Settings: Outpatient
 Intervention: Budesonide MMX® 9 mg versus placebo
Outcomes Illustrative comparative risks* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) No of Participants
 (studies) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Assumed risk Corresponding risk
Control Budesonide MMX® 9 mg versus placebo
Remission (combined clinical and endoscopic remission) 68 per 10001 154 per 1000 
 (103 to 232) RR 2.25 
 (1.5 to 3.39) 900
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate2  
Clinical improvement 286 per 1000 371 per 1000 
 (283 to 486) RR 1.3 
 (0.99 to 1.7) 442
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate3  
Endoscopic improvement 324 per 1000 418 per 1000 
 (327 to 538) RR 1.29 
 (1.01 to 1.66) 442
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate4  
Histologic remission 123 per 1000 186 per 1000 
 (137 to 254) RR 1.51 
 (1.11 to 2.06) 900
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low5,6  
Endoscopic remission 143 per 1000 223 per 1000 
 (161 to 309) RR 1.56 
 (1.13 to 2.16) 695
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate7  
Serious adverse events 31 per 1000 27 per 1000 
 (10 to 74) RR 0.88 
 (0.33 to 2.4) 513
 (2 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 low8  
Adverse events 412 per 1000 449 per 1000 
 (391 to 519) RR 1.09 
 (0.95 to 1.26) 971
 (3 studies) ⊕⊕⊕⊝
 moderate9  
*The basis for the assumed risk (e.g. the median control group risk across studies) is provided in footnotes. The corresponding risk (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio;
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
 High quality: Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect.
 Moderate quality: Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.
 Low quality: Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate.
 Very low quality: We are very uncertain about the estimate.

1 Control group risk estimate come from the control arm of meta‐analysis, based on included trials
 2 Downgraded one level due to sparse data (101 events)
 3 Downgraded one level due to sparse data (147 events)
 4 Downgraded one level due to sparse data (165 events)
 5 Downgraded one level due to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 47%)
 6 Downgraded one level due to sparse data (139 events)
 7 Downgraded one level due to sparse data (128 events)
 8 Downgraded two levels due to very sparse data (15 events)
 9 Downgraded one level due to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 54%)