D'Haens 2010.
Methods | Randomised double‐blind study comparing Budesonide‐MMX® with placebo at 4 weeks Patients who had worsening of their disease or who were not improving after 2 weeks were switched to open‐label budesonide therapy In an open‐label extension, from 4 to 8 weeks, all patients received oral Budesonide‐MMX® Only outcomes following the first arm of the trial were considered in this review |
|
Participants | Adult patients with mild to moderate, active left‐sided ulcerative colitis (N = 36) Active disease was defined as a clinical activity index (CAI) of < 14 (Rachmilewitz 1989) Stable doses of immunomodulators (methotrexate or azathioprine) or 5‐ASA products were allowed Participants were excluded if they had severe disease (CAI > 14), extensive disease (inflammation extending proximal to the splenic flexure) or distal proctitis Additional exclusion criteria included the use of systemic or topical steroids within the preceding 4 weeks, or previous use of TNF‐α antagonists. |
|
Interventions | Budesonide‐MMX® 9 mg once daily for 8 weeks (n = 18), or placebo (n = 18) for 4 weeks followed by Budesonide‐MMX® for a further 4 weeks | |
Outcomes | Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission (CAI ≤ 4) or a clinical improvement (50% reduction in their CAI score) at 4 weeks Secondary outcomes included a reduction in clinical symptoms at 8 weeks, a reduction in CAI by 70% and changes in the Rachmilewitz Endoscopic Index Score at 4 and 8 weeks In both groups, morning cortisol levels were tested and ACTH stimulation tests were performed at 4 and 8 weeks |
|
Notes | This trial was supported by Crinos S.p.A., Italy and Cosmo Technologies, Ireland, manufacturers of budesonide‐MMX® | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment allocation |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Treatment Allocation | Low risk | Physicians, patients and outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | One patient was withdrawn at 2 weeks because of treatment failure (treatment group not stated) 5 patients who were initially randomised to the placebo arm were switched to open label treatment with budesonide at 2 weeks because of failure to improve or disease worsening with placebo |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | The published report includes all expected outcomes |
Other bias | Low risk | The study appears to be free of other sources of bias |