Rubin 2014.
Methods | Randomised double‐blind, placebo controlled trial | |
Participants | Non‐pregnant patients, age 18‐75 years, with active mild to moderate UC (UCDAI score ≥ 4 and ≤ 10) with a mucosal appearance score of ≥ 1, despite the use of oral 5‐ASA (≥ 2.4g daily for at least 6 weeks) were included (N = 510) Patients with disease limited to the rectum were excluded Other exclusion criteria included infectious colitis, malignancy within the past 5 years (with the exception of non‐melanoma skin cancers), active peptic ulcer disease, a history of toxic megacolon, Crohn's disease or indeterminate colitis. Patient with tuberculosis, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C or HIV were excluded. Patients with severe disease in other organs or systems were excluded, including those with type 1 diabetes The use of oral corticosteroids, other than budesonide, the use of immunosuppressant medications and the use of biologic therapy, within 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 3 months of randomisation, respectively, were also exclusion criteria Patients who had used rectal 5‐ASA or corticosteroid products within 2 weeks of randomisation were also excluded |
|
Interventions | Budesonide multi‐matrix system (MMX®) 9 mg (n =230) Placebo (n = 228) |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcome: induction of remission (combination of clinical and endoscopic remission) following 8 weeks of therapy Secondary outcomes: clinical remission, clinical response, histologic remission and histologic healing, evaluation of treatment failures, quality of life, C‐reactive protein and fecal calprotectin levels at 8 weeks |
|
Notes | Currently only published in abstract form Modified intention‐to‐treat population was 458 This trial was supported by Santarus, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. which manufactures budesonide‐MMX®. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Computer‐generated randomisation |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Centralized randomisation via an interactive voice response system |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment allocation |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) Treatment Allocation | Low risk | Physicians, patients and outcome assessors were blinded to the treatment allocation |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Abstract publication |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract publication |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Abstract publication |