Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;12:9835. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14146-5

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Comparison of the reaction time (RT) between the incongruent and neutral conditions. The incongruent condition exhibits a significantly slower RT than the neutral condition (***P < 0.001). (B) Comparison of the error rate between the incongruent and neutral conditions. Significant Stroop interference effects are observed (**P < 0.005). (C) The mean difference of the RT in incongruent and neutral trials indicates Stroop interference for each condition. (D) Stroop interference (RT) differences between post- and pre-sessions for each condition. Stroop interference differences are significantly more positive in the hypoxic exercise (HE) condition than in the milder hypoxic exercise (ME) condition (*P < 0.05). Error bars indicate the standard error.