Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 28;12:10891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15023-x

Table 2.

Results of multiple regression analyses to estimate the association between myopia and environmental factors.

Axial length, mm (N = 53) Cycloplegic objective refraction, diopter (N = 24)
β 95% CI P β 95% CI P
Overall
Fluorescein TBUT (seconds) − 0.067 − 0.110 to − 0.023 0.004 0.149 − 0.195 to 0.492 0.41
Age (years) 0.065 0.012 to 0.118 0.02 0.227 − 0.308 to 0.762 0.42
Gender − 0.102 − 0.381 to 0.178 0.48 0.658 − 1.75 to 3.07 0.60
Number of myopic parents
None NA NA NA NA NA NA
One 0.242 − 0.238 to 0.723 0.33 − 1.14 − 3.81 to 1.53 0.43
Both 0.497 0.033 to 0.960 0.04 − 4.10 − 8.590 to 0.385 0.10
Outdoor activity time (min/day) − 0.027 − 0.034 to − 0.021  < 0.001 0.012 − 0.047 to 0.072 0.69
Sleeping time (min/day) 0.002 − 0.0002 to 0.004 0.08 0.010 − 0.007 to 0.028 0.26
Near work time (min/day) 0.001 − 0.001 to 0.003 0.33 − 0.009 − 0.021 to 0.003 0.15
Reading distance (cm) − 0.011 − 0.033 to 0.011 0.36 − 0.069 − 0.222 to 0.085 0.40
R2 0.831 0.508

Two multiple regression models were used. Axial length or cycloplegic objective refraction was used as the outcome variable. P values less than statistically significant level (< 0.05) are marked in bold. For gender, boys were numbered 1 and girls were numbered 0. β coefficient, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, TBUT tear film breakup time, NA not applicable.