Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 6;2015(8):CD005248. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005248.pub3

Comparison 1. Intravenous in‐line filter versus no filter.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality during hospitalisation 2 530 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.52, 1.47]
2 Risk of proven septicaemia per infant 2 530 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.59, 1.27]
3 Rates of proven septicaemia per 1000 catheter day 1   Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 0.79 [0.45, 1.37]
4 Localised phlebitis 3 641 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.40, 3.77]
5 Suspected septicaemia 1 88 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.57 [0.18, 1.81]
6 Localised thrombi 1 88 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.2 [0.01, 4.05]
7 Proven necrotising enterocolitis 1 88 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.2 [0.01, 4.05]
8 Composite thrombus, proven or unproven sepsis, necrotising enterocolitis 1 88 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.38 [0.19, 0.77]