Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 21;11:e49. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.41

Table 4.

Regression analysis on mean difference in HbA1C from baseline to 12 weeks after interventiona

Unadjusted P-value Adjusted model P-value
Coefficient (95 % CI) Coefficient (95 % CI)
Age (year) −0⋅04 (−0⋅1, 0⋅03) 0⋅30
Gender
Female −0⋅7 (−1⋅5, 0⋅2) 0⋅11 −0⋅3 (−1⋅1, 0⋅5) 0⋅44
Education
High school
Diploma 0⋅2 (−0⋅9, 1⋅2) 0⋅76 0⋅4 (−0⋅5, 1⋅3) 0⋅34
Graduate and higher 0⋅2 (−0⋅5, 0⋅9) 0⋅64 0⋅1 (−0⋅4, 0⋅7) 0⋅63
Income (million Rp)
<5
5 to <10 0⋅4 (−0⋅3, 1⋅2) 0⋅28
≥10 0⋅6 (−0⋅3, 1⋅5) 0⋅21
Smoking
None smoker
Current smoker 0⋅7 (−0⋅9, 1⋅5) 0⋅08 0⋅5 (−0⋅2, 1⋅3) 0⋅18
Ex-smoker 0⋅4 (−0⋅4, 1⋅1) 0⋅34 −0⋅3 (−1, 0⋅4) 0⋅44
Family history of DM
No −0⋅6 (−1⋅3, −0⋅03) 0⋅04 −0⋅1 (−0⋅7, 0⋅5) 0⋅78
Anthropometry
Weight at baseline 0⋅01(−0⋅01, 0⋅04) 0⋅23
Waist circumference at baseline 0⋅01(−0⋅02, 0⋅04) 0⋅60
BMI at baseline 0 (−0⋅07, 0⋅08) 0⋅91
Baseline Biochemical indicator
HbA1C −0⋅5 (−0⋅7, −0⋅3) <0⋅001 −0⋅5 (−0⋅7, −0⋅3) <0⋅001*
FBG −0⋅02 (−0⋅01, 0⋅02) 0⋅28
PPG 0 (−0⋅01, 0⋅01) 0⋅20
Insulin use (baseline)
Yes 1⋅1 (0⋅2, 2⋅1) 0⋅02 0⋅7 (−0⋅2, 1��5) 0⋅11
Treatment
Intervention −0⋅83 (−1⋅4, −0⋅2) 0⋅01 −0⋅7 (−1⋅2, −0⋅1) 0⋅02*
a

Adjusted R-square: 0⋅407.

*

P < 0⋅001.