Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 25;50:101510. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101510

Table 2.

Risks of various kidney outcomes between SGLT2i and GLP1RA users.

Outcomes SGLT2i (N = 2551)
GLP1RA (N = 2551)
SGLT2i vs GLP1RA
Cumulative incidence
Crude incidence rate (Events / 10,000 person-years)
Cumulative incidence
Crude incidence rate (Events / 10,000 person-years)
New events Rate Estimate 95% CI Follow-up person-years New events Rate Estimate 95% CI Follow-up person-years HR 95% CI P-value
Composite kidney outcome* 153 6·00% 384·5 (326·0, 450·5) 3979 187 7·33% 518·1 (446·5, 597·9) 3610 0·771 (0·620, 0·959) 0·020
Sustained reduction in eGFR ≥50% 73 2·86% 179·2 (140·4, 225·3) 4074 85 3·33% 226·8 (181·1, 280·4) 3748 0·817 (0·592, 1·127) 0·219
End-stage kidney disease 27 1·06% 65·6 (43·2, 95·5) 4115 46 1·80% 120·2 (88·0, 160·4) 3826 0·532 (0·328, 0·862) 0·010
Incident macroalbuminuria 79 4·34% 260·2 (206·0, 324·3) 3036 101 5·42% 362·6 (295·4, 440·6) 2785 0·743 (0·551, 1·003) 0·052

Abbreviations: HR = Hazard ratio; CI = Confidence interval; eGFR = Estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Composite kidney outcome included sustained reduction in eGFR ≥50%, end-stage kidney disease (defined by eGFR <15mL/min/1·73m2, dialysis or kidney transplant), incident macroalbuminuria, or kidney-related mortality.

HR <1 indicates SGLT2i users had lower risks of kidney outcomes compared to GLP1RA users.

There was no death from kidney causes identified in this study during the follow-up period.