Table 3.
Binary logistic regression analysis of the pregnancy outcomes in the three groups
| Cumulative clinical pregnancy | Cumulative live birth | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonsurgery vs control | Rate | 30/47 (63.8) vs 40/49 (81.6) | 26/47 (55.3) vs 39/49 (79.6) | ||
| Crude OR | 0.363 (0.143–0.921) | 0.033 | 0.219 (0.118–0.717) | 0.007 | |
| Adjusted ORa | 0.607 (0.198–1.863) | 0.328 | 0.316 (0.114–0.880) | 0.032 | |
| Surgery vs control | Rate | 18/29 (62.1) vs 40/49 (81.6) | 18/29 (62.1) vs 39/49 (79.6) | ||
| Crude OR | 0.405 (0.141–1.167) | 0.094 | 0.462 (0.163–1.305) | 0.145 | |
| Adjusted ORa | 0.238 (0.059–1.103) | 0.055 | 0.294 (0.083–1.044) | 0.063 | |
| Surgery vs nonsurgery | Rate | 18/29 (62.1) vs 30/47 (63.8) | 18/29 (62.1) vs 26/47 (55.3) | ||
| Crude OR | 0.927 (0.356–2.416) | 0.877 | 1.322 (0.514–3.410) | 0.563 | |
| Adjusted ORa | 0.388 (0.092–1.645) | 0.199 | 0.667 (0.172–2.586) | 0.558 | |
a Logistic regression analysis was conducted by adjusting for age, infertility duration, body mass index (BMI), average endometrial thickness in the transfer cycle and average high-quality embryo rate