Table 4.
Sensitivity analysis
| Cumulative live birth lower limit | Cumulative live birth upper limit | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonsurgery vs control | Rate | 26/59 (44.1) vs 39/61 (63.9) | 38/59(64.4) vs 51/61(83.6) | ||
| Crude OR | 0.444 (0.214–0.925) | 0.030 | 0.355 (0.150–0.840) | 0.019 | |
| Adjusted ORa | 0.451 (0.199–1.102) | 0.050 | 0.350 (0.136–0.900) | 0.04 | |
| Surgery vs control | Rate | 18/42 (42.9) vs 39/61 (63.9) | 31/42(73.8)vs 51/61(83.6) | ||
| Crude OR | 0.423 (0.189–0.945) | 0.036 | 0.553 (0.210–1.451) | 0.229 | |
| Adjusted ORa | 0.292 (0.113–1.059) | 0.043 | 0.563 (0.187–1.692) | 0.332 | |
| Surgery vs nonsurgery | Rate | 18/42 (42.9) vs 26/59 (44.1) | 31/42(73.8)vs 38/59(64.4) | ||
| Crude OR | 0.952 (0.428–2.115) | 0.904 | 1.557 (0.652–3.718) | 0.318 | |
| Adjusted ORa | 0.618 (0.230–1.663) | 0.341 | 1.472 (0.481–4.500) | 0.498 | |
Data are presented as n (%) and odds ratios (95% confidence intervals)
CI Confidence Interval, OR Odds Ratio
a Logistic regression analysis was conducted by adjusting for age, infertility duration, body mass index (BMI), average endometrial thickness in the transfer cycle and average high-quality embryo rate