Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Chem Theory Comput. 2022 Feb 11;18(3):1359–1381. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00590

Table 2:

Summary of the efficiency of each technique (in force evaluations) in each system (PDBid listed) simulation. All ordered water molecules were removed prior to simulations. If any simulation failed to rehydrate each target site based on our defined criteria, the result is shown as ”F” in the table. We calculated force evaluations (in million evaluations) required to achieve the point where all hydration sites were successfully rehydrated in each simulation. The calculated force evaluations include both equilibration and production phases. See Section 3 for detailed force evaluation in equilibration phases for each method. ”N.D.” means no data since the simulation was not conducted.

2QBS 2XAB 2XJG 3RLP* 3RLQ 3RLR 5I29* 4ZLZ* 5I1Q* 2ZFF*
BLUES (restrained) 8.3/13.9/6.9 23.5/41.5/23.5 6.9/6.9 113.5/167.5 41.5/23.5/23.5 6.9/23.5 6.9/6.9 6.9/8.3 12.5/13.9 F/F
MD (unrestrained) 40.5/F F/F 145.5/F F/35 F/F F/F 12.5/18.1 6.9/13.9 F/F 40.5/11.1
MD (restrained) F/F F/F F/F F/F F/F F/F 6.9/6.9 F/F F/F F/F F/F
grand (unrestrained) F/2.1 0.7/2.1 0.7/0.7 3.5/3.5 0.7/0.7 0.7/0.7 2.1/2.1 2.1/2.1 9.1/F 2.1/2.1
grand (restrained) 0.7/0.7/0.7 N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. N.D. F/F/F
*

based on the electron density map analysis.