Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 15;146(1):21–35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056805

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Effect of MUFA and mixed UFA-rich diets vs a SFA-rich diet on risk-associated lipids in the DIVAS trial (Dietary Intervention and Vascular Function). A, Volcano plot of effect of diet intervention on within class-FA sum concentrations from a linear regression model with postintervention concentration as dependent variable and diet type (indicator variable for MUFA-rich [yes/no], mixed UFA-rich [yes/no], SFA-rich as reference), respective lipid baseline concentration, respective baseline, and postintervention class sum concentration, age, sex, and body mass index as independent variables. Direction of associations in the EPIC-Potsdam trial (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition) was consistent between type 2 diabetes and CVD for all risk-associated lipids. All labeled points were statistically significant after accounting for multiple testing. B, Word clouds for overlap between change through diet type and observed risk association in EPIC-Potsdam by disease. CE indicates cholesteryl esters; Cer, ceramides; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DG, diacylglycerols; dhCer, dihydroceramides; FA, fatty acids; FFA, free fatty acids; HexCer, hexosylceramides; LacCer, lactosylceramides; LPC, lysophosphatidylcholines; LPE, lysophosphatidylethanolamines; MG, monoacylglycerols; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; PC, phosphatidylcholines; PE, phosphatidylethanolamines; PEO, phosphatidylethanolamine ether; PEP, phosphatidylethanolamine plasmalogen; PI, phosphatidylinositol; SFA, saturated fatty acid; SM, sphingomyelins; TG, triacylglycerols; and UFA, unsaturated fatty acid.