Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies logoLink to Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies
. 2022 Apr 21;37(1):69–74. doi: 10.15605/jafes.037.01.13

Review of Literature on Akkermansia muciniphila and its Possible Role in the Etiopathogenesis and Therapy of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Made Indira Dianti Sanjiwani 1,✉, I Putu Hendri Aryadi 1, I Made Siswadi Semadi 2
PMCID: PMC9242659  PMID: 35800592

Abstract

Akkermansia muciniphila is a promising gut microbiota for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A. muciniphila stimulates intestinal wall integrity, is an anti-inflammatory agent, and reduces endoplasmic reticulum stress, lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis. These properties make A. muciniphila a potential treatment option for T2DM by reducing insulin resistance and increasing insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance in different tissues. This article explores the possible role of A. muciniphila in T2DM management, along with the various methods known to modulate A. muciniphila.

Keywords: Akkermansia muciniphila, ER stress, gut microbiota, insulin resistance, probiotic, type 2 diabetes mellitus

INTRODUCTION

The complex etiopathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) includes dysbiosis or the imbalance of gut microbiota composition as a contributory factor.1 Dysbiosis may induce systemic low-grade inflammation which leads to insulin resistance.2 An important gut microbiota in T2DM is Akkermansia muciniphila (A. muciniphila), a butyrate-producing microbiota which stimulates the secretion of incretin hormones, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP-2) and peptide YY (PYY). Incretins stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells.3 Furthermore, A. muciniphila improves intestinal wall integrity and reduces endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis.4

Management of T2DM currently focuses on controlling the symptoms and preventing complications through lifestyle intervention and administration of antidiabetic drugs. The modulation of A. muciniphila is a simple and potentially disease-modifying treatment of T2DM. This literature review will discuss the role of A. muciniphila in the treatment of T2DM to date and its prospects in the future.

METHODOLOGY

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Database, Science Direct, and Google Scholar for relevant studies about A. muciniphila and T2DM that were published in English between the 2nd up to the 23rd of April 2020. The keywords included “Akkermansia muciniphila” AND “type 2 diabetes mellitus” OR “obese” OR “insulin resistance.” Titles and abstracts were screened to avoid duplication, and reviews of the complete manuscripts were done to determine the appropriateness of the studies to be included. Additionally, the reference lists of the selected articles were reviewed to identify other relevant articles. Selected studies have met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS) framework. We included studies involving subjects with T2DM or metabolic syndrome who received intervention to increase A. muciniphila or improve metabolic parameters in comparison to a control group. The outcomes considered were the measured levels of A. muciniphila and/or improvement in other metabolic parameters. We excluded non-English-language studies, unavailable full texts, case reports and letters for this review article. Ultimately, 42 studies were included as references in the synthesis of this review article, and 9 were used for the methods of modulation of A. muciniphila.

Gut microbiota and type 2 diabetes mellitus

T2DM is a multifactorial metabolic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. The factors that cause hyperglycemia are the egregious eleven, namely: pancreatic beta-cells failure to produce insulin; increased pancreatic alpha cell glucagon secretion; increased liver gluconeogenesis; impaired insulin action in skeletal muscles; increased lipolysis and free fatty acids from adipose tissue; intestinal GLP-1 deficiency; decreased gastric production of amylin; increased kidney reabsorption of glucose through sodium-glucose contransporters-2 (SGLT-2); low-grade systemic inflammation; neural stimulation to increase appetite due to high levels of insulin and changes in the composition of the gut microbiota.2

Alterations of the gut microbiota induce inflammation and play an important role in the complex pathogenesis of T2DM. Gut microbiota promote fermentation of undigested carbohydrates, stimulate insulin secretion, inhibit gluconeogenesis, increase insulin sensitivity and have anti-inflammatory effects. Gut microbiota convert undigested carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids (SCFA),5 metabolites which stimulate intestinal L cells to secrete incretin hormones (GLP-1, GLP-2 and PYY) that trigger pancreatic beta-cells to release insulin.6 Dysbiosis decreases intestinal wall integrity and induces systemic low-grade inflammation. This metabolic endotoxemia state is precipitated by the dependent attachment of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to the CD14 / toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 complex on the surface of intestinal cells leading to inflammation and subsequent insulin resistance.7-9

Akkermansia muciniphila

A. muciniphila belongs to the Verrucomicrobia (phylum), Verrucomicrobiae (class), Verrucomicrobiales (order), Verrucomicrobiacaea (family), dan Akkermansia (genus) and is a microbiome that is abundant in the human intestine. It makes up 3% of the entire gut microbiota colony and is a butyrate-producing bacteria.10 Derrien et al. discovered A. muciniphila in 2004 and it has since become a popular research field because of its potential as a probiotic.11 It ferments mucin as a source of carbon, energy, and nitrogen, then releases sulfate after the mucin fermentation is complete.

A. muciniphila colonizes the mucosal lining of the intestine,4 and various studies have shown that the amount of A. muciniphila in the intestines of healthy people is significantly greater than those who have diabetes and obesity.12,13 Another study by Schneeberger et al. in 2015 also found an inversely proportional relationship between the number of A. muciniphila and body weight, inflammation and the metabolic syndrome.14

The role of Akkermansia muciniphila in type 2 diabetes mellitus

A. muciniphila has a role in the pathogenesis of T2DM through several mechanisms (Figure 1). An increase in the number of bacterial colonies improves the integrity of the intestinal wall by colonizing the mucus layer of the cell surface and protects the cells from LPS, which attaches itself independently. The amount of A. muciniphila in the intestine also depends on the amount mucin – their energy source – present. In addition, the administration of A. muciniphila also enhances the expression of regenerating islet-derived protein (Reg3γ), a peptide that stimulates aggregation between microbiota in the intestinal epithelium.15

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The role of Akkermansia muciniphila in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

A. muciniphila improves insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance through its anti-inflammatory mechanisms. The inflammatory process begins with the entry of LPS into the intestinal cell mucosa as an endotoxin, which then attaches to the lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) which initiates activation of nuclear factor-KB (NF-KB) and Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK).16 A. muciniphila can reduce the amount of phosphor-JNK significantly and increases the NF-KB inhibitor protein and IKBA protein levels in the liver, indicating that the inactivation of the NFKB and JNK pathways results in an anti-inflammatory reaction. This is supported by an increase in the concentration of both α-tocopherol (an essential antioxidant and anti-inflammatory factor),17 and β-sitosterol, which maintain the immune system and provide anti-inflammatory activity in the intestinal endothelial cells.18 A. muciniphila also induces the release of anti-inflammatory cytokines, namely IL-10 and IL-8.19

The improvement in glucose tolerance is due to decreased lipotoxicity and ER stress. A. muciniphila reduces unfolded protein levels inside the cell – a marker of ER stress – such as immunoglobulin heavy chain-binding protein / glucose-regulated protein 78 (BiP / GRP78) and PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) in the liver and skeletal muscle. In addition, A. muciniphila decreases genes contributing to the ER stress process, namely, a decrease in the concentration of mRNA C / EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and tribbles homolog 3 (TRB3) in the large intestine, and a decrease in mRNA of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) in the jejunum. These genes activate the unfolded protein response, which triggers ER stress.20 This mechanism suggests that A. muciniphila can reduce ER stress and interfere with the genetic process.

A. muciniphila also plays a role in the process of lipogenesis and gluconeogenesis. A. muciniphila supplementation significantly reduces the expression of genes that participate in lipogenesis, namely sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBP1c) and fatty acid translocase (CD36) in the liver and muscles. A 2015 in vivo study by Schneeberger et al., found a low amount of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACCase) in muscle after A. muciniphila supplementation.14 ACCase is an enzyme needed to form malonyl-CoA from acetyl-CoA as a substrate for fatty acid biosynthesis. The decrease in the amount of ACCase indicates that A. muciniphila decreases fat deposition in hepatic tissue and muscle, thereby increasing insulin sensitivity.8

In gluconeogenesis, A. muciniphila supplementation is known to deplete visceral fat mass and increase glucose tolerance based on an intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT). Its administration induces a rise in phosphorus AKT Ser473 in the liver and muscles a marker of increased insulin sensitivity in these tissues. A. muciniphila also depresses the expression of gluconeogenic enzymes hepatic glucose-6-phosphatase (G6P) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK). Normally, these enzymes are suppressed by insulin. A decrease in their levels indicates improved hepatic insulin sensitivity.21

Current insights on Akkermansia muciniphila modulation as a therapeutic innovation for type 2 diabetes mellitus

The modulation of A. muciniphila can be done through several methods such as direct administration as a probiotic, administration of prebiotics and by other interventions like administration of metformin and through bariatric surgery (Table 1).

Table 1.

Table 1. Modulation of intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila

Author (year) Intervention Subjects Findings Ref
In vitro
Marcial-Coba et al. (2019) Microencapsulation in xanthan and gellan gum matrix. Stored aerobically or anaerobically for 1 month at 4 °C or 25 °C. A. muciniphila DSM22959 and Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum ATCC14917 as the comparator Cryoprotectant solutions improved the survival of both strains (survival rate 64-76%; p < 0.001).
Survivability of A. muciniphila was significantly better when stored anaerobically at 4 °C.		 22
In vivo
Everard et al. (2011) Prebiotic administration; oligo-fructose (0.3 g/mouse/day) for 5 weeks. High-fat diet-induced obese mice Increased in the abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila by ~100 fold. 25
Roopchand et al. (2015) Grape polyphenols administration for 13 weeks High-fat diet-induced obese mice Increased in the abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila. (cecal sample: 6.2 ± 4.6% on control group, versus 49.1 ± 2.0% on intervention group; Fecal sample: 7.5 ± 4.7% on control group, versus 54.8 ± 2.5% on intervention group. 26
Tu et al. (2018) Dietary black raspberry (Rubus occidental, BRB) for 7 weeks Normal and specific-pathogen free C57BL/6 mice A. muciniphila population increased by 157-fold in the intervention group compared to control group 27
Shin et al. (2014) 300 mg/kg/day of metformin treatment by oral gavage for 6 weeks Diet-induced obese mice (C57BL/6 mice, fed either a normal-chow diet or a high-fat diet) Metformin treatment significantly improved the glycaemic profile of HFD-fed mice and increased the number of mucin-producing goblet cells (p<0.0001) 30
Clinical
Depommier et al. (2019) Daily oral supplementation of 1010 A. muciniphila bacteria either live or pasteurized for three months. Overweight/obese insulin-resistant volunteers Pasteurized A. muciniphila improved insulin sensitivity (p = 0.002), reduced insulinemia (p = 0.006) and plasma total cholesterol (p = 0.02); slightly decreased body weight (p = 0.091), fat mass (p = 0.092) and hip circumference (p = 0.091) compared to placebo group 24
de la Cuesta-Zuluaga et al. (2016) Metformin treatment 459 participants (28 with diabetes, 14 taking Metformin, and 84 participants without diabetes) Participants with metformin-taking diabetes had higher relative abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila compared with those without diabetes (p = 0.003, q value = 0.01) 31
Murphy et al. (2016) RYGB compared to SG 14 obese T2DM patients underwent laparoscopic SG (n = 7) or RYGB (n = 7) RYGB resulted in increased Firmicutes and Actinobacteria phyla but decreased Bacteroidetes phyla. SG resulted in increased Bacteroidetes phyla. 33
Dao et al. (2019) RYGB compared to GB 65 women with severe obesity A significant increase in A. muciniphila relative abundance after RYGB, but not correlated with metabolic improvement. 37
Open in a new tab

Abbreviation: GB, gastric binding; GIT, gastrointestinal tract; RYGB, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG, sleeve gastrectomy

Direct administration of probiotic Akkermansia muciniphila

A. muciniphila can be administered directly but the dose and viability of the bacteria require further investigation. The effective dose of A. muciniphila in humans is unknown, but the standard dose of probiotics is in the range 109 to 1011 colony-forming units (CFU).22

One alternative to safely and effectively deliver A. muciniphila to the intestine is by microencapsulation.23 An in vitro study simulated the administration of microencapsulated A. muciniphila through the digestive tract and showed its viability was reduced 2.01 log CFU ml-1 under fasting conditions (pH 2) and by 0.3 log CFU ml-1 at post-meal conditions (pH 4) with a survival rate of 0.97% and 49.76%, respectively. The unencapsulated cells had a more significant decrease in viability at fasting and post-meal of 3.12 log CFU ml-1 and 1.53 log CFU ml-1 respectively. This implies that microencapsulation effectively protects the bacteria to reach the intestine in vitro.22 Administration of probiotics after meals is also the best way to maintain bacterial viability.22,23

A proof-of-concept randomized-controlled exploratory study was conducted by administering live and pasteurized A. muciniphila to 40 overweight/obese volunteers with insulin resistance. There were no significant changes in inflammatory markers associated with hematology, liver, kidney and muscle function. However, A. muciniphila increased insulin sensitivity and decreased total plasma cholesterol, body weight and fat mass.24 This first human trial indicated that both live and pasteurized A. muciniphila was well-tolerated, safe and improves several metabolic parameters.

Prebiotic as growth enhancing substance of intestinal Akkermansia muciniphila

The use of prebiotics together with the consumption of probiotics has become popular in recent years. Oligofructose, an oligosaccharide of short-chain inulin fragments, is a widely used prebiotic. In 2011, Everard et al., found that oral administration of oligofructose restored the level of A. muciniphila in high-fat-diet-fed (HFD) mice and those with genetic manipulation of leptin deficiency and obesity. Baseline A. muciniphila levels were 100 and 3300 times less than the control group, respectively.25

Polyphenol is another substance increasingly being used as prebiotic. It is derived from grapes and nourishes gut microbiota, stimulates growth, increases metabolic function and reduces inflammation.26 This is seen as reductions in levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), bacterial LPS and the absence of serum IL-6. Roopchand et al., in 2015 compared clinical differences between a group of mice given polyphenol plus soy protein isolate (SPI) and a group given SPI alone. Mice given polyphenol-SPI had a lower body weight, liver mass and liver fat, and significantly higher glucose tolerance than the SPI-diet-alone group.26 Moreover, a 2008 study by Tu et al., evaluated the administration of black raspberries containing polyphenol and oligosaccharide in normal mice. They showed an elevation in the proportion of A. muciniphila by as much as 157 times compared to normal mice without the intervention.27

Apples are another rich source of this substance, with procyanidin as the dominant polyphenol. The procyanidin macromolecules in apples may suppress pro-inflammatory factors in the intestinal mucosa, inhibit weight gain and improve the Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio, including A. muciniphila, as a trigger factor of intestinal barrier function repair.28

Roopchand et al., added that the relatively low absorption of polyphenol is vital to how it fights oxygen radicals. This study also found an increase in A. muciniphila on HFD mice fecal concentration from 7.5% to 54.8%.26

The effect of metformin on Akkermansia muciniphila abundance in the intestine

Metformin is the most commonly prescribed drug in the management of T2DM.29 Its accumulation in the intestine is approximately 300 times higher than in plasma, making the intestine the body’s main reservoir of metformin.23 A 2014 study by Shin et al., attempted to prove the effect of metformin on gut microbiota composition. The prevalence of Verrucomicrobe associated with A. muciniphila was significantly lower in mice given HFD than those who were on normal diet (ND). However, after metformin administration, Verrucomicrobe increased significantly in the HFD group, while no significant change was observed in the ND group. Metformin was also found to significantly increase goblet cells in the HFD and ND groups of mice, independent of the metabolic profile or diet. Furthermore, they found a positive correlation between the number of goblet cells and the availability of A. muciniphila in the intestine.30

A 2015 study by Forslund et al., showed that the abundance of A. muciniphila in the intestine of T2DM patients was similar to non-diabetic patients after metformin administration. Those who were treated with metformin also showed an increased production of propionate, a substance produced through mucin fermentation by A. muciniphila.29 A recent study by De La Cuesta-Zuluaga et al., also revealed that T2DM patients treated with metformin had 3.4 times more A. muciniphila in their intestines than those who did not receive this therapy.31 Metformin enhances the intestinal protective barrier which may work synergistically with A. muciniphila in maintaining the integrity of the mucus layer.29 Although further investigation into other bacterial genus/species that may be involved in the metformin-induced improvement of metabolic parameters is required, these findings may suggest that an increase in A. muciniphila may contribute to the antidiabetic properties of metformin.

Bariatric surgery and the improvement of intestinal microbiota composition

Bariatric surgery (BS) is an effective option in the management of obese patients and their complications.32 One interesting outcome related to BS is the improvement in the gut microbiota population and diversity after the procedure, despite no observed difference in the parameters of glucose homeostasis. In 2017, Murphy et al., report a significant increase in general gut microbiota diversity from baseline to 3 months post-Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) and even up to 1-year post-treatment.33

Although BS improves gut microbiota composition, the mechanisms as to how are still not fully understood. Aside from modification of the digestive tract anatomy, there are several factors that can affect post-BS intestinal microbiota including post-surgery food preferences, reduced food consumption and nutritional malabsorption.13,34,35

A study by Ulker et al., in 2018 has shown that a difference in post-BS diet therapy options, namely a low-fat-high-carbohydrate diet compared to a high-carbohydrate-low-glycemic index diet affects the number of specific strains of the gut microbiota.32 The second factor that affects the post-BS intestinal microbiota are hormonal changes in leptin and ghrelin. Circulating serum leptin levels are reported to positively impact the growth of Mucispirillum, Lactococcus and Lachnospiraceae.36 Finally, the composition of the gut microbiota is influenced by the gastrointestinal pH. The pH level in each component of the gastrointestinal tract distal to the stomach becomes more basic after surgery due to the decrease in gastric acid production from its reduced volume.32 Alterating the pH affects microbiota level to a significant extent. A study by Murphy et al., in 2017 demonstrated a decrease in Bacteroidetes and an increase in Firmicutes and Actinobacteria groups due to post-BS pH changes.33

A post RYGB study by Dao et al., in 2019 revealed an increase in the mean relative number of A. muciniphila after 3 months. By 1 year-post operative follow-up, A. muciniphila levels increased 200-fold, although the total number was still lower than non-obese subjects. Furthermore, patients with a relatively low level of A. muciniphila at baseline had the greatest increase in numbers regardless of the type of BS performed.37 Hence, an improvement in the intestinal microbiota composition is one of the positive effects after any BS procedure.

Future perspectives

A. muciniphila as a potential therapy for T2DM can be facilitated by fecal microbiota transplantion (FMT), already in use for Clostridium difficile infection and inflammatory bowel disease.38,39 The complex interaction between patients and their gut microbiota should trigger further consideration regarding other factors that may influence the modulation of A. muciniphila and the intestines, in particular a comprehensive dietary review to maintain the homeostasis and efficiency of A. muciniphila. The mechanisms related to the gut microbiome and the selection between different strains require more data. Administration of probiotics has been noted to trigger disturbances in the horizontal transfer of genes between microbiota.40 Several studies have found the occurrence of horizontal antibiotic-resistant gene transfer by lactic acid bacteria in fermented foods.41,42 A. muciniphila is known to be related to increase insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance. However, an actual reduction in the glucose parameters (Hba1c, fasting blood glucose) is still limited to be found. Thus, this gaps in knowledge should be further explored in the future researches.

CONCLUSION

Alterations of the gut microbiota is one of the pathophysiologic changes that underlies the development of T2DM. The amount of A. muciniphila is inversely correlated with body weight, inflammation and the metabolic syndrome, and can be a potential intervention for T2DM by improving these parameters. Increasing the levels of A. muciniphila can be achieved through several modulations such as functional food or probiotic intake, metformin and bariatric surgery. However, clinical studies are still sparse and further research is needed to determine its definite role and safety among patients with T2DM.

Statement of Authorship

All authors certified fulfillment of ICMJE authorship criteria.

Author Disclosure

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Funding Source

None.

References

  • 1.Carding S, Verbeke K, Vipond DT, Corfe BM, Owen LJ. Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota in disease. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015;26:26191. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.3402/mehd.v26.26191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wen L, Duffy A. Factors influencing the gut microbiota, inflammation, and type 2 diabetes. J Nutr. 2017;147(7):1468S-75S. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.3945/jn.116.240754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim YA, Keogh JB, Clifton PM. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and insulin sensitivity. Nutr Res Rev. 2018;31(1):35-51. PMID: . 10.1017/S095442241700018X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Collado MC, Derrien M, Isolauri E, de Vos WM, Salminen S. Intestinal integrity and Akkermansia muciniphila, a mucin-degrading member of the intestinal microbiota present in infants, adults, and the elderly. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(23):7767-70. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1128/AEM.01477-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rosenbaum M, Knight R, Leibel RL. The gut microbiota in human energy homeostasis and obesity. Trends Endocrinol Metabol. 2015; 26(9):493-501. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1016/j.tem.2015.07.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yabe D, Kuwata H, Seino Y. The journey to understanding incretin systems: Theory, practice and more theory. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10(5):1171-3. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1111/jdi.13123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Han JL, Lin HL. Intestinal microbiota and type 2 diabetes: From mechanism insights to therapeutic perspective. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(47):17737-45. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.17737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhao S, Liu W, Wang J, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila improves metabolic profiles by reducing inflammation in chow diet-fed mice. J Mol Endocrinol. 2017;58(1):1-14. PMID: . 10.1530/JME-16-0054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pero R, Fico G, Scudiero O, Laneri S. Microbiota and LPS-induced obesity inflammation: Therapeutic implications. Preprints. 2018: 2018070375. https://10.20944/preprints201807.0375.v1. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Belzer C, De Vos WM. Microbes inside—from diversity to function: The case of Akkermansia. ISME J. 2012;6(8):1449-58. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1038/ismej.2012.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Derrien M, Vaughan EE, Plugge CM, de Vos WM. Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin-degrading bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2004;54(Pt 5):1469-76. PMID: . 10.1099/ijs.0.02873-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Karlsson CL, Önnerfält J, Xu J, Molin G, Ahrné S, Thorngren-Jerneck K. The microbiota of the gut in preschool children with normal and excessive body weight. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012;20(11):2257-61. PMID: . 10.1038/oby.2012.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dao MC, Everard A, Aron-Wisnewsky J, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila and improved metabolic health during a dietary intervention in obesity: Relationship with gut microbiome richness and ecology. Gut. 2016;65(3):426-36. PMID: . 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schneeberger M, Everard A, Gómez-Valadés AG, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila inversely correlates with the onset of inflammation, altered adipose tissue metabolism and metabolic disorders during obesity in mice. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16643. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1038/srep16643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Romaní J, Caixàs A, Escoté X, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is increased in patients with psoriasis with metabolic syndrome, and correlates with C-reactive protein. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2013;38(1):81-4. PMID: . 10.1111/ced.12007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tsaousidou E, Paeger L, Belgardt BF, et al. Distinct roles for JNK and IKK activation in agouti-related peptide neurons in the development of obesity and insulin resistance. Cell Rep. 2014;9(4):1495-506. PMID: . 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Greer RL, Dong X, Moraes ACF, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila mediates negative effects of IFNγ on glucose metabolism. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13329. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1038/ncomms13329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Loizou S, Lekakis I, Chrousos GP, Moutsatsou P. β-Sitosterol exhibits anti-inflammatory activity in human aortic endothelial cells. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2010;54(4):551-8. PMID: . 10.1002/mnfr.200900012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Remely M, Hippe B, Zanner J, Aumueller E, Brath H, G Haslberger A. Gut microbiota of obese, type 2 diabetic individuals is enriched in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila and Peptostreptococcus anaerobius after weight loss. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2016;16(2):99-106. PMID: . 10.2174/1871530316666160831093813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cnop M, Foufelle F, Velloso LA. Endoplasmic reticulum stress, obesity and diabetes. Trends Mol Med. 2012;18(1):59-68. PMID: . 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lochhead PA, Salt IP, Walker KS, Hardie DG, Sutherland C. 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside mimics the effects of insulin on the expression of the 2 key gluconeogenic genes PEPCK and glucose-6-phosphatase. Diabetes. 2000;49(6):896-903. PMID: . 10.2337/diabetes.49.6.896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Marcial-Coba MS, Cieplak T, Cahú TB, Blennow A, Knøchel S, Nielsen DS. Viability of microencapsulated Akkermansia muciniphila and Lactobacillus plantarum during freeze-drying, storage and in vitro simulated upper gastrointestinal tract passage. Food Funct. 2018;9(11):5868-79. PMID: . 10.1039/c8fo01331d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ropot AV, Karamzin AM, Sergeyev OV. Cultivation of the next-generation probiotic Akkermansia muciniphila, methods of its safe delivery to the intestine, and factors contributing to its growth in vivo. Curr Microbiol. 2020;77(8):1363-72. PMID: . 10.1007/s00284-020-01992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Depommier C, Everard A, Druart C, et al. Supplementation with Akkermansia muciniphila in overweight and obese human volunteers: A proof-of-concept exploratory study. Nat Med. 2019;25(7):1096-103. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1038/s41591-019-0495-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Everard A, Lazarevic V, Derrien M, et al. Responses of gut microbiota and glucose and lipid metabolism to prebiotics in genetic obese and diet-induced leptin-resistant mice. Diabetes. 2011;60(11):2775-86. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.2337/db11-0227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Roopchand DE, Carmody RN, Kuhn P, et al. Dietary polyphenols promote growth of the gut bacterium Akkermansia muciniphila and attenuate high-fat diet–induced metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2015;64(8):2847-58. PMID: PMCID: . 10.2337/db14-1916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tu P, Bian X, Chi L, Gao B, Ru H, Knobloch TJ, et al. Characterization of the functional changes in mouse gut microbiome associated with increased Akkermansia muciniphila population modulated by dietary black raspberries. ACS omega. 2018;3(9):10927-37. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.2337/db14-1916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Masumoto S, Terao A, Yamamoto Y, Mukai T, Miura T, Shoji T. Non-absorbable apple procyanidins prevent obesity associated with gut microbial and metabolomic changes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:31208. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1038/srep31208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Forslund K, Hildebrand F, Nielsen T, et al. Disentangling type 2 diabetes and metformin treatment signatures in the human gut microbiota. Nature. 2015;528(7581):262-6. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1038/nature15766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shin NR, Lee JC, Lee HY, et al. An increase in the Akkermansia spp. population induced by metformin treatment improves glucose homeostasis in diet-induced obese mice. Gut. 2014;63(5):727-35. PMID: . 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.De La Cuesta-Zuluaga J, Mueller NT, Corrales-Agudelo V, et al. Metformin is associated with higher relative abundance of mucin-degrading Akkermansia muciniphila and several short-chain fatty acid–producing microbiota in the gut. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(1):54-62. PMID: . 10.2337/dc16-1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ulker I, Yildiran H. The effects of bariatric surgery on gut microbiota in patients with obesity: A review of the literature. Biosci Microbiota, Food Health. 2019;38(1):3-9. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.12938/bmfh.18-018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Murphy R, Tsai P, Jüllig M, Liu A, Plank L, Booth M. Differential changes in gut microbiota after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy bariatric surgery vary according to diabetes remission. Obes Surg. 2017;27(4):917-25. PMID: . 10.1007/s11695-016-2399-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Debédat J, Clément K, Aron-Wisnewsky J. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in human obesity: Impact of bariatric surgery. Curr Obes Rep. 2019;8(3):229-42. PMID: . 10.1007/s13679-019-00351-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cani PD. Severe obesity and gut microbiota: Does bariatric surgery really reset the system? Gut. 2019;68(1):5-6. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Queipo-Ortuño MI, Seoane LM, Murri M, et al. Gut microbiota composition in male rat models under different nutritional status and physical activity and its association with serum leptin and ghrelin levels. PloS One. 2013;8(5):e65465. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.1371/journal.pone.0065465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dao MC, Belda E, Prifti E, et al. Akkermansia muciniphila abundance is lower in severe obesity, but its increased level after bariatric surgery is not associated with metabolic health improvement. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2019;317(3):E446-59. PMID: . 10.1152/ajpendo.00140.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Costello SP, Tucker EC, La Brooy J, Schoeman MN, Andrews JM. Establishing a fecal microbiota transplant service for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(7):908-14. PMID: . 10.1093/cid/civ994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sunkara T, Rawla P, Ofosu A, Gaduputi V. Fecal microbiota transplant–A new frontier in inflammatory bowel disease. J Inflamm Res. 2018;11:321-8. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.2147/JIR.S176190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.van Reenen CA, Dicks LM. Horizontal gene transfer amongst probiotic lactic acid bacteria and other intestinal microbiota: What are the possibilities? A review. Arch Microbiol. 2011;193(3):157-68. PMID: . 10.1007/s00203-010-0668-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Nawaz M, Wang J, Zhou A, et al. Characterization and transfer of antibiotic resistance in lactic acid bacteria from fermented food products. Curr Microbiol. 2011;62(3):1081-9. PMID: . 10.1007/s00284-010-9856-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zheng M, Zhang R, Tian X, Zhou X, Pan X, Wong A. Assessing the risk of probiotic dietary supplements in the context of antibiotic resistance. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:908. PMID: . PMCID: . 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies are provided here courtesy of ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies

RESOURCES