Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 1;18(7):1865–1875. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9904

Table 3.

Certainty assessment (GRADE tool) for the quantitative cephalometric variables evaluated.

Certainty assessment Summary of findings
Participants (studies) Follow up Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias Overall certainty of evidence Study event rates (%) Relative effect (95% CI) Anticipated absolute effects
With control With OSA Risk with control Risk difference with OSA
SNA
119 (3 observational studies) not serious seriousa not serious very seriousb none ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 54 65 - The mean SNA was 81.5º MD 0.69º higher  (0.63 lower to 2 higher)
SNB
119 (3 observational studies) not serious very seriousc not serious very seriousb none ⨁◯◯◯ VERY LOW 54 65 - The mean SNB was 76.81º MD 0.17º higher  (1.02 lower to 1.36 higher)
ANB
119 (3 observational studies) not serious not serious not serious serious none ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE 54 65 - The mean ANB was 4.7º MD 0.61º higher  (0.2 lower to 1.42 higher)
NSBa
119 (3 observational studies) not serious not serious not serious very serious none ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 54 65 - The mean NSBa was 127.11º MD 0.32º lower  (2.4 lower to 1.75 higher)
U1-L1
66 (2 observational studies) not serious not serious not serious very serious none ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 27 39 - The mean U1-L1 was 125.89º MD 0.21º lower  (4.82 lower to 4.4 higher)
U1-SN
66 (2 observational studies) not serious not serious not serious very seriousb none ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW 27 39 - The mean U1-SN was 106.54º MD 0.67º higher  (2.18 lower to 3.52 higher)

aI2 = 65%. bA large variation in 95% CI was detected. cI2 = 78%.

CI: Confidence interval; MD: Mean difference.