Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 16;16:876927. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2022.876927

Table 3.

Comparison among the three developed fusion strategies in complete models.

Complete model FN-F1-OCT FN-Weight-OCT FN-Auto-OCT Kermany
ACC CNV 1 0.996 0.988 0.968
DME 1 0.996 0.996 0.948
Drusen 0.944 0.9 0.952 0.944
Normal 0.996 0.992 0.996 0.984
Weighted avg 0.985 0.971 0.983 0.961
Recall CNV 1 0.996 0.988 0.968
DME 1 0.996 0.996 0.948
Drusen 0.944 0.9 0.952 0.944
Normal 0.996 0.992 0.996 0.984
Weighted avg 0.985 0.971 0.983 0.961
Specificity CNV 0.981 0.967 0.983 0.979
DME 1 0.998 0.995 0.991
Drusen 0.998 0.999 1 0.989
Normal 1 0.999 1 0.989
Weighted avg 0.995 0.991 0.995 0.987
Precision CNV 0.947 0.909 0.95 0.938
DME 1 0.992 0.984 0.971
Drusen 0.996 0.996 1 0.967
Normal 1 0.996 1 0.969
Weighted avg 0.986 0.973 0.984 0.961
F1 CNV 0.973 0.951 0.969 0.953
DME 1 0.994 0.99 0.959
Drusen 0.969 0.946 0.975 0.955
Normal 0.998 0.994 0.998 0.976
Weighted avg 0.985 0.971 0.983 0.961
AUC CNV 0.991 0.98 0.985 Not Mentioned
DME 1 1 0.995 Not Mentioned
Drusen 0.971 0.95 0.976 Not Mentioned
Normal 0.998 1 0.998 Not Mentioned
Weighted avg 0.99 0.983 0.989 Not Mentioned