Table 3.
Comparison among the three developed fusion strategies in complete models.
| Complete model | FN-F1-OCT | FN-Weight-OCT | FN-Auto-OCT | Kermany | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACC | CNV | 1 | 0.996 | 0.988 | 0.968 |
| DME | 1 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.948 | |
| Drusen | 0.944 | 0.9 | 0.952 | 0.944 | |
| Normal | 0.996 | 0.992 | 0.996 | 0.984 | |
| Weighted avg | 0.985 | 0.971 | 0.983 | 0.961 | |
| Recall | CNV | 1 | 0.996 | 0.988 | 0.968 |
| DME | 1 | 0.996 | 0.996 | 0.948 | |
| Drusen | 0.944 | 0.9 | 0.952 | 0.944 | |
| Normal | 0.996 | 0.992 | 0.996 | 0.984 | |
| Weighted avg | 0.985 | 0.971 | 0.983 | 0.961 | |
| Specificity | CNV | 0.981 | 0.967 | 0.983 | 0.979 |
| DME | 1 | 0.998 | 0.995 | 0.991 | |
| Drusen | 0.998 | 0.999 | 1 | 0.989 | |
| Normal | 1 | 0.999 | 1 | 0.989 | |
| Weighted avg | 0.995 | 0.991 | 0.995 | 0.987 | |
| Precision | CNV | 0.947 | 0.909 | 0.95 | 0.938 |
| DME | 1 | 0.992 | 0.984 | 0.971 | |
| Drusen | 0.996 | 0.996 | 1 | 0.967 | |
| Normal | 1 | 0.996 | 1 | 0.969 | |
| Weighted avg | 0.986 | 0.973 | 0.984 | 0.961 | |
| F1 | CNV | 0.973 | 0.951 | 0.969 | 0.953 |
| DME | 1 | 0.994 | 0.99 | 0.959 | |
| Drusen | 0.969 | 0.946 | 0.975 | 0.955 | |
| Normal | 0.998 | 0.994 | 0.998 | 0.976 | |
| Weighted avg | 0.985 | 0.971 | 0.983 | 0.961 | |
| AUC | CNV | 0.991 | 0.98 | 0.985 | Not Mentioned |
| DME | 1 | 1 | 0.995 | Not Mentioned | |
| Drusen | 0.971 | 0.95 | 0.976 | Not Mentioned | |
| Normal | 0.998 | 1 | 0.998 | Not Mentioned | |
| Weighted avg | 0.99 | 0.983 | 0.989 | Not Mentioned | |