Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;2016(8):CD001302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001302.pub3

Konig 1998.

Methods Randomised, placebo‐controlled, double blind
Participants 104 infertile women at risk of severe OHSS (53 HES/51 control)
 E2 the basic risk factor of OHSS) was > 1500 pg/mL and more than 10 follicles on the day of hCG injection
 Age (HES 32.6 versus placebo 30.7 years)
 Duration of infertility (not mentioned)
 No. of hMG ampoules (not mentioned, similar in both groups )
 No. of oocytes (not mentioned, similar in both groups)
 No. of embryos (not mentioned)
Interventions Study group: 1000 mL of 6% HES solution shortly after embryo transfer (48 hr after the oocyte retrieval)
originally 104 pt randomised: HES 53 control 51; data presented only for 51 and 50 patients respectively. dropout 2.9% (3 women; 2 missing data, 1 allergic reaction)
 Duration of infusion: over 2 hours
 Control group: 1000 mL NaCl 0.9% solution
Outcomes Method of diagnosing severe OHSS: criteria of WHO, 1973
 Severe OHSS 0/53 versus 1/51
 Pregnancy: not stated but similar between both group
 Method of diagnosing pregnancy: not stated (clinical pregnancy)
 Tolerability: yes
 Safety: one case of urticaria
 Cost‐benefit: not stated
Notes Commercially funded
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Methods not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Double blinded; both patients and physicians blinded, but outcome assessors not mentioned
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 101/104 (97%) randomised women were included in analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear whether data on adverse events were collected prospectively as it was not a prespecified outcome, though mentioned in the results section
Other bias Unclear risk No other potential bias identified
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure