Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 16;13:917010. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.917010

TABLE 3.

Effects of different treatments on agronomic characters of fruiting bodies.

Treatment Cap diameter (mm) Stipe diameter (mm) Stipe length (mm)
A1 51.17 ± 5.36def 41.17 ± 2.68cd 113.73 ± 3.82bcde
A2 46.63 ± 0.67efg 39.44 ± 1.25cde 123.53 ± 4.34b
A3 59.22 ± 5.57b 43.25 ± 5.50bc 113.33 ± 21.68bc
A4 47.54 ± 3.02efg 36.10 ± 3.31def 108.86 ± 13.32cdef
A5 50.47 ± 1.03def 40.17 ± 3.70cde 117.33 ± 7.04bcd
A6 49.84 ± 2.08def 39.46 ± 1.81cde 90.23 ± 4.93h
B1 42.67 ± 1.16g 33.12 ± 2.09f 104.16 ± 10.19dfeg
B2 48.01 ± 1.91defg 36.50 ± 3.12def 94.03 ± 10.12gh
B3 45.66 ± 5.11fg 34.52 ± 4.44ef 101.10 ± 3.68fegh
B4 45.26 ± 1.17fg 37.23 ± 1.64cdef 95.96 ± 4.79fgh
B5 51.86 ± 1.58de 40.64 ± 4.55cde 116.60 ± 6.35bcd
B6 49.51 ± 1.54def 40.66 ± 1.03cde 105.67 ± 2.89defg
C 57.64 ± 4.65bc 42.15 ± 2.40cd 127.23 ± 9.88b
D 65.71 ± 3.82a 51.17 ± 3.31a 139.60 ± 7.68a
CK 55.65 ± 2.54cd 47.97 ± 3.91ab 112.50 ± 6.22bc

The data are mean ± standard deviation, and different letters in the same column indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).