Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Otol Neurotol. 2022 Jul 1;43(6):e663–e670. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003540

Table 1.

Comparisons to historical controls. Percent (n/ sample size)

Test Study subjects Healthy controls p-values

Bi-thermal caloric weakness, abnormal responses 31.8 (N=7) 16.1 (N=10) 0.21

Dix-Hallpike responses 0.005
a) normal a) 59.1 (N=13) a) 65.0 (N=39)
b) classical b) 22.7 (N=5) b) 1.7 (N=1)
c) nonclassical c) 18.2 (N=4) c) 33.3 (N=20)

cVEMP responses 0.03
a) normal  a) 53.9 (N=14) a) 76.7 (N=46)
b) abnormal but measurable  b) 0 b) 0
c) unmeasurable  c) 46.2 (N=12) c) 23.3 (N=14)

Summary VNG score, abnormal 95.5 (N=21) 59.7 (N=37) 0.002

Spontaneous nystagmus present 90.91 (N=20) 16.1 (N=1) <0.001

TW eyes closed, abnormal 47.6 (N=10) 48.4 (N=30) 0.99

CTSIB head still, abnormal 72.7 (N=16) 67.7 (N=42) 0.70

CTSIB head yaw, abnormal 86.4 (N=19) 66.1 (41) 0.10

CTSIB head pitch, abnormal 45.4 (N=10) 87.1 (N=54) 0.52