Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;59(6):2101733. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01733-2021

TABLE 2.

Metabolites associated with OCS

Metabolite Cluster # SAns (n=123) SAns+OCS (n=66) p-value + FDR
Cystathionine A 0.87 (0.71–1.14) 1.10 (0.85–1.53) 0.005 0.003
Histidine A 0.87 (0.73–0.98) 0.77 (0.61–0.85) 0.005 0.003
Isoleucine A 1.10 (0.92–1.20) 0.92 (0.77–1.06) 0.029 0.010
5-Aminolevulinic acid B 0.91 (0.76–1.12) 0.76 (0.58–0.92) 0.046 0.015
Kynurenic acid B 0.89 (0.78–1.04) 0.82 (0.73–0.95) 0.047 0.014
Uracil B 0.86 (0.73–1.01) 0.66 (0.52–0.78) 2.16×10−4 0.001
5-Hydroxyindoleacetic acid D 1.06 (0.96–1.19) 1.19 (1.04–1.34) 0.022 0.008
Aspartic acid D 1.17 (0.98–1.35) 0.86 (0.73–1.07) 0.001 0.001
Glutamic acid§ D 1.16 (1.04–1.37) 1.04 (0.90–1.20) 0.058 0.015
N-Acetylputrescine D 1.06 (0.94–1.25) 1.24 (1.04–1.42) 0.035 0.012
N-Methyl-D-aspartic acid D 0.92 (0.82–1.00) 1.16 (1.05–1.30) 7.52×10−5 0.001
S-Adenosylhomocysteine D 1.00 (0.83–1.16) 1.15 (1.04–1.38) 0.004 0.003
Serotonin D 1.23 (1.06–1.44) 1.41 (1.17–1.83) 0.017 0.007
Methylthioadenosine E 1.25 (1.07–1.65) 0.90 (0.72–1.26) 0.003 0.003
Xanthine E 1.16 (0.97–1.39) 0.96 (0.69–1.18) 0.008 0.004
2-Furoylglycine G 0.68 (0.47–0.90) 2.05 (1.24–3.15) 0.003 0.003
4-Pyridoxic acid G 0.94 (0.84–1.05) 1.06 (0.88–1.36) 0.048 0.014
Allantoin G 1.02 (0.84–1.26) 1.17 (0.95–1.47) 0.019 0.008
Aminovaleric acid G 1.19 (0.71–1.78) 0.83 (0.44–1.21) 0.014 0.006
Glucosamine G 0.87 (0.77–1.06) 1.18 (0.97–1.43) 0.003 0.003
Maltose G 1.09 (0.91–1.49) 1.84 (1.19–2.86) 0.003 0.003
Methylhippuric acid G 0.89 (0.71–1.16) 1.18 (0.94–1.49) 0.014 0.006
Sucrose G 1.13 (0.83–1.51) 1.78 (1.34–2.35) 2.35×10−4 0.001
Xylose G 1.00 (0.82–1.16) 1.44 (1.01–2.04) 0.002 0.003

SAns: non-smoking severe asthmatics; #: cluster assignment as shown in figure 1; : all fold-change estimates are in comparison to healthy participants and displayed as the mean (95% CI); +: Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test between OCS-treated and non-treated groups; §: glutamic acid was included due to its high magnitude of effect on the corresponding multivariate principal components–canonical variate analysis model (figure 2).