Table 1.
Year | Population size* | Mean silhouette coefficient† | % Misclassification rates‡ | Optimal cluster numbers§ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kokolopori | 2017¶ | 35 (0.66) | 0.40 (2) | 0 | 2, 3, 3 (0.34) |
2018 | 55 (0.57) | 0.33 (4) | 3 | 4, 5, 4 (0.52) | |
2019 | 51 (0.5) | 0.46 (4) | 0 | 4, 5, 4 (0.66) | |
Ngogo | 2011 | 104 (0.70) | 0.14 (3) | 27 | 3, 7, 4 (0.33) |
2012 | 106 (0.68) | 0.16 (2) | 2 | 2, 7, 3 (0.31) | |
2013 | 105 (0.69) | 0.15 (2) | 6 | 2, 7, 4 (0.32) |
*In parentheses the population sex ratio (male/female).
†In parentheses the optimal number of clusters.
‡Percentage of observations with negative silhouette values.
§Optimal number of clusters by different methods: from left to right, the silhouette coefficient, affinity propagation, and modularity. In parentheses is the modularity value.
¶Only individuals of two potential groups (Ekalakala and Kokoalongo) included.