Skip to main content
. 2022 Feb 8;11(4):e023849. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023849

Table 1.

Reproducibility Measured on the Scan–Rescan Data Set for GL‐Shortening and MAPSE

Median Interquartile range Difference between the 2 scans R 2 P value CV N MDC90
Scan 1 Scan 2 Scan 1 Scan 2
GL‐Shortening AI 14.6% 14.7% 11.8%–18.0% 12.0%–17.3% 0.23%±1.49% 0.86 0.59 7.2% 14 2.53%
Expert 14.2% 14.4% 10.9%–18.3% 11.6%–18.0% 0.11%±2.26% 0.76 0.83 11.1% 29 3.85%
MAPSE AI 12.4 mm 11.8 mm 9.5–13.9 mm 9.9–13.5 mm 0.20±1.08 mm 0.87 0.54 6.5% 9 1.84 mm
Expert 12.5 mm 12.1 mm 10.1–14.4 mm 10.6–14.0 mm 0.20±1.57 mm 0.76 0.57 9.1% 16 2.70 mm

AI was treated as an independent operator and compared with the expert. The median and percentile values are given. Interscan and intrasubject differences between the 2 scans are reported as mean±SD, together with the R 2 ratio and within‐subject CV. The number of samples (N) required to detect 1 mm or 1% change in MAPSE and GL‐Shortening was computed. Minimal detectable changes are reported with 90% power of significance. AI indicates artificial intelligence; CV, coefficient of variation; GL‐Shortening, global longitudinal shortening; MAPSE, mitral annular plane systolic excursion; and MDC90, minimal detectable changes with 90% power of significance.